This editorial offers an introduction to the current issue. |
Beleid en Maatschappij
Over dit tijdschriftMeld u zich hier aan voor de attendering op dit tijdschrift zodat u direct een mail ontvangt als er een nieuw digitaal nummer is verschenen en u de artikelen online kunt lezen.
Van de redactie |
Nieuwe waarden |
Auteurs | Cody Hochstenbach |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Ontwikkeling en institutionalisering van een anti-establishmentpartijDe casus Leefbaar Rotterdam |
Trefwoorden | party institutionalization, political parties, local government, Governance, anti-establishment party |
Auteurs | Gideon Broekhuizen en Julien van Ostaaijen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
There is much research available about the development and government participation of new political parties (e.g. Pedersen, 1982; Deschouwer, 2008). Scholars show that survival for new political parties is often difficult, as they in general had little time for party building (Bollyer & Bytzek, 2017). Moreover, the expectation for specific types of new parties, mainly anti-establishment parties, is that they pay a high(er) electoral price when participating in government (Van Spanje, 2011). The Dutch case of the local political party of ‘Leefbaar Rotterdam’ (Livable Rotterdam, LR) is a noteworthy exception to this rule. It won the Rotterdam local election in 2002 with almost 35 percent of the votes, only months after its establishment. Until this day, LR remains an electorally large and relevant political party, participating in Rotterdam government twice (2002-2006 and 2014-2018). The article shows that in comparison to some national new political parties, LR succeeded in building a solid party organization and that from a party institutionalization perspective, it can be considered an institutionalized party. Regarding theory, it provides some additions to party building literature, such as the importance of personal relations and the balance between organizational unity and member autonomy. |
Artikel |
Hoe SyRI het belang van transparantie onderstreept |
Trefwoorden | SyRI, digitisation, transparency, trust, ICT |
Auteurs | Tosja Selbach en Barbara Brink |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Dutch digital fraud detection system SyRI was announced to set up to detect social security fraud quickly and effectively and by doing so, maintain support for the social security system. It was the formal position that for the sake of effectiveness, no information about the algorithm and very limited information about the application of the system should be shared. The authors argue on the basis of a policy analysis, a legal exploration and a literature study that the lack of transparency about the chosen method and the application of the digital fraud detection system in social security can have far-reaching consequences for both the individual and society . The information sharing and the use of algorithms can lead to suspicion of and declining confidence in the government, and a reduced motivation to comply with the prevailing rules. This could undermine the original purpose. |
Reflectie & debat |
Welke overheid na Fantoomgroei? |
Auteurs | Yvonne La Grouw en Mark van Ostaijen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Reflection and debate initiates academically inspired discussions on issues that are on the current policy agenda. |
Reflectie & debat |
Wie ontbindt zijn duivels? |
Auteurs | Hendrik Noten |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Reflection and debate initiates academically inspired discussions on issues that are on the current policy agenda. |
Reflectie & debat |
Niet politici maar praktisch wijze professionals wijzen de weg naar fundamentele veranderingen |
Auteurs | Sophie Albers |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Reflection and debate initiates academically inspired discussions on issues that are on the current policy agenda. |
Reflectie & debat |
Een andere overheid vereist een andere verhouding tot maakbaarheid |
Auteurs | Robert van Putten |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Reflection and debate initiates academically inspired discussions on issues that are on the current policy agenda. |
Dossier |
WRR: Decennia integratie van migratieadviesGrenzen van aanpassing en incorporatie |
Auteurs | Mark van Ostaijen en Myrte Hoekstra |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors discuss recent research findings that are of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Dossier |
Van ‘Etnische minderheden’ naar ‘Samenleven in verscheidenheid’Vier decennia integratiebeleid in vijf WRR-rapporten |
Auteurs | Han Entzinger |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors discuss recent research findings that are of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Dossier |
Samen leven anno 2050Meer dan koffiedikkijkerij? |
Auteurs | Arjen Verweij |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors discuss recent research findings that are of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Dossier |
Minderheden en het regeringsbeleid: afvlakkend draagvlak |
Auteurs | Walter Palm |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors discuss recent research findings that are of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Boekensignalement |
In gesprek met de terrorist |
Auteurs | Rik Peels |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors review recently published books on subjects of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Boekensignalement |
Grenzen aan gewiekste maakbaarheid |
Auteurs | Joram Feitsma |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors review recently published books on subjects of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Boekensignalement |
Inventarisatie van ontwikkelingen en perspectieven op de bijstand |
Auteurs | Fabian Dekker |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors review recently published books on subjects of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
De blinde vlek |
Cancelverhalen: maak het nog wat enger dan die ene slechterik |
Auteurs | Yvonne La Grouw |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The most relevant part of a discussion is not what is discussed but what cannot be spoken of. The real taboos are those for which it is taboo to call them taboos. The status quo defines itself as non-ideological while denouncing any challenge to itself as radical. |