DOI: 10.5553/RP/048647002010052001005

Res PublicaAccess_open

Article

Opkomstplicht: stimulans of frustratie?

Een landenvergelijkende studie naar de gevolgen van opkomstplicht op politieke participatie

Trefwoorden compulsory voting, political participation, turnout, elections
Auteurs
DOI
Toon PDF
Samenvatting Auteursinformatie Statistiek Citeerwijze Citaties (4)
Dit artikel is keer geraadpleegd.
Dit artikel is 0 keer gedownload.
Aanbevolen citeerwijze bij dit artikel
Tom van der Meer en Jan van Deth, "Opkomstplicht: stimulans of frustratie?", Res Publica, 1, (2010):73-93

    Compulsory voting does not only increase voting turnout; it is also expected to have positive spill-over effects. Supposedly, citizens who are obliged to cast a vote will be more engaged in politics than citizens who are allowed to avoid politics. This article reviews the main arguments for this expectation. A rival expectation is formulated based on the idea that enforcements, duties and sanctions are likely to decrease the willingness of citizens to participate politically. A cross-national multi-level empirical test – covering turnout and political participation in twenty established democracies – shows that compulsory voting indeed increases voting turnout. Yet neither positive nor negative spill-over effects for other modes of political participation can be detected. Apparently, the consequences of compulsory voting are restricted to turnout.

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in


Print dit artikel