There seems to be a contradiction between what is happening in public administration discipline and public administration practice. Whereas public administration discipline and law largely separated during the past decades public administration practice and law have converged. Recently three books have been published which emphasize the importance of the rule of law as an explanatory variable for public administration's design and behavior. In this review essay these books are discussed from a public administration theory perspective. The point of departure of the authors substantially differs. Beckett (‘Public Management and the Rule of Law’, 2010) focuses on the rule of law, Cooper (‘Public Law & Public Administration’, 2007) and Rosenbloom, O'Leary & Chanin (‘Public Administration and Law’, 2010) aim at constitutionalizing public administration. The rule of law and the constitution prove to be shaky grounds for a public administration theory. In general constitutional competence may be important for public managers and professionals, but what it means for everyday practices is not easy to establish. The authors therefore extensively describe American public law, emphasizing the constitutional constraints and general administrative law. With these books the authors provide excellent building blocks for a comparative approach of the rule of law from a public administration perspective. The aim of such an approach would be to discover patterns between legal and constitutional designs on the one hand and everyday administrative practices on the other hand. |
Zoekresultaat: 3 artikelen
Jaar 2011 xBoekbespreking |
De rechtsstaat: Terug op de bestuurskundige agenda |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 4 2011 |
Trefwoorden | rule of law, constitutionalism, administrative law |
Auteurs | Stavros Zouridis |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Boekbespreking |
Vier keer verandermanagement in publieke organisaties: Een essay |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 2 2011 |
Trefwoorden | Management of change, public organizations |
Auteurs | Joris van der Voet |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The literature on the management of organizational change is mostly based on private sector research. Research on the management of change in public sector organizations is relatively scarce. Because of the specific characteristics of public sector organizations, insights in the management of change may not be translated from one sector to the other. In this essay, four recent books about organizational change in public sector organizations are reviewed. Based on these books and other literature, an overview of the contemporary insights in the management of change of public sector organizations is presented.The essay concludes with an agenda for future research. |
Artikel |
Sluipend kwaliteitsverlies in de geestelijke gezondheidszorgProfessionals over de gevolgen van marktwerking |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2011 |
Trefwoorden | mental health care, marketization, Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG’s), policy implementation, professionalism |
Auteurs | Nienke van Sambeek, Evelien Tonkens en Christian Bröer |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In order to facilitate the creation of a regulated market, Diagnostic Treatment Combinations (DBC’s in Dutch) have been introduced in Dutch mental health care in 2008. DBC’s are developed to distinguish and price the ‘products’ of health care, in order to make comparison and competition between health care providers possible. In this qualitative study we analyzed mental health care professionals experiences with the DBC-system. We focused on two questions: (1) what does the DBC-system and the related introduction of marketization of mental health care mean for professionals? and (2) how do professionals cope with the DBC-system in their daily practices? We found that the logics of the market and bureaucracy, both incorporated in the DBC-system, often conflicted with the values and ethics of mental health care professionals. Mental health professionals experience deterioration of professionalism and quality of care. They were coping with conflicting values by non-compliance with rules and pragmatic use of the DBC-system. It is argued that the efforts of professionals to protect the quality of their work might actually lead to invisibility of the problems they encounter, which reinforces the policy they criticize. |