In this paper, I study gender-based voting behavior in the Belgian proportional electoral system. In particular, I investigate two possible causes for why voters experience the need to simplify their voting decision by using a gender-cue. First, in line with the findings of previous studies, I find that voters with lower levels of political sophistication who are less able to collect and process political information, are consequently more likely to use the sex of a candidate as a shortcut. However, the effect of political sophistication on gender-based voting behavior is limited. Second, based on the literature, I expect that the low information context of the second-order European elections would cause both high and low information voters to become more reliant on gendercues to simplify their voting decision and by extent would cause the effect of political sophistication on gender-based voting to diminish. Against theoretical expectations, I find that the effect of the electoral context is negligible. |
Zoekresultaat: 3 artikelen
Jaar 2017 xArtikel |
Informatieveiligheid: van Bentham naar HabermasEen column van Digicommissaris Bas Eenhoorn |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 1 2017 |
Auteurs | Drs. Bas Eenhoorn |
Article |
Het geslacht van de kandidaat als heuristisch stemmotiefEen onderzoek naar het effect van politieke sofisticatie en electorale context op gender-based stemgedrag |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 2 2017 |
Auteurs | Sjifra de Leeuw |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Deliberatieve democratie: ervaringen met diversiteit in burgertop Amsterdam |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2017 |
Trefwoorden | Democracy, Summit, Dialogue, Diversity, Homogeneity |
Auteurs | Dr. Peer Smets en Marloes Vlind MSc |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This paper will show how citizens’ summits in the Netherlands cope with diversity of participants and the impact of this on those initiatives. This provides insight in why diversity is hard to reach and what can be done to improve it. Presently, dissatisfaction about the Dutch democratic system is widespread. Solutions are being sought to strengthen Dutch participatory democracy. For this objective, citizens’ summits develop different kind of initiatives. However, citizens participating in these summits are a homogeneous group, namely mainly white, middle aged and highly educated. Mechanisms of exclusion, selection of candidates, homogeneous composition of the organization, and a dominating intellectual/rational way of debating are playing a role here. Citizens with different backgrounds need to be included in these initiatives to obtain a better representation of society’s voices. This notion has been strengthened by theory, which shows that diversity enables more creativity and innovation. |