In this paper we investigate the effects of political dissatisfaction, political distrust and ethnocentrism on support to the incumbent coalition in three different municipalities in Flanders. Theoretically, we define the concept of political trust, at which it is differentiated from political satisfaction and political alienation. At the same time, four dimensions of political distrust are disentangled: competence, integrity, responsiveness and justice. Empirically, four research questions may be distinguished. First, we investigate whether political satisfaction, political trust and ethnocentrism have an independent effect on support to the ruling majority. Second, we check whether there are differential effects of the dimensions of political trust on the dependent variable in the different municipalities.Third, we try to connect the micro-level data with macro-level, by linking the results with the characteristics of the local government and the party system. Fourth, we examine the influence of the presence of extreme right. |
Zoekresultaat: 5 artikelen
Jaar 2007 xBoekbespreking |
Transnationalisme en burgerschap |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2007 |
Auteurs | Marianne van Bochove en Katja Rusinovic |
Auteursinformatie |
Boekbespreking |
De maakbaarheid van sociaal vertrouwen |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2007 |
Auteurs | Gerard Breeman |
Auteursinformatie |
Article |
Coalitiesteun in Antwerpen, Hasselt en OostkampDe invloed van politieke ontevredenheid, politiek wantrouwen en etnocentrisme vergeleken |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 4 2007 |
Auteurs | Marc Swyngedouw, Koen Abts en Jarl Kampen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Tussen eenheid en eendrachtRegionale bestuurskracht door netwerkvorming |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 2 2007 |
Auteurs | Geert Teisman |
Auteursinformatie |
Article |
Het IMBY-syndroom: de (on)zin van de Antwerpse districtraadsverkiezingen |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 1 2007 |
Auteurs | Peter Thijssen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Together with the city council elections, the citizens of Antwerp elected on 8 October 2006 for the second time their district councils. This new decentralised political level is primarily initiated to restore the confidence of the citizens in the city (and district) government(s). By analysing the results of the city and the district elections we try to find indications whether citizens feel closer to their new district governments or not. Firstly district elections resulted definitely not in less blank votes. Secondly, the number of list votes is higher on the district elections than on the city elections, while we would have expected a higher number of preferential votes. Thirdly, we see that the differences between the electoral results of the city elections and the district elections are becoming more pronounced. Although this last result seems to support the legitimacy of the decentralised district they merely reflect changes in the logic of the city elections. Mainly as a result of media coverage the city elections were direct elections of the mayor. Therefore voters used the district elections to vote for their preferred political party. This was not always possible at city level, because some parties did not have an eligible candidate for mayor. Generally spoken, we can conclude that the district elections do not give much proof of a closer connection between the citizens and the city government. |