|
Zoekresultaat: 5 artikelen
Jaar 2008 xArtikel |
De angst voor bevolkingskrimp, vergrijzing en bevolkingspolitiek |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2008 |
Auteurs | Harry van Dalen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
In voor- en tegenspoed?Over krimp en de verzorgingsstaat |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2008 |
Auteurs | Romke van der Veen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article is concerned with the consequences of economic and demographic decline for the welfare state. The issue of decline itself is not investigated. Decline is taken for granted and the consequences of decline are examined. In this article the sociological 'logic' of social policy is investigated and subsequently applied to the issue of decline. The policy-mechanisms that are discussed are: selective versus universal social policy; the extent and character of redistribution; and individual versus collective responsibility. The question that is raised in the final section is what demographic decline in particular might imply for a universal welfare state: more selectivity in social policy? less redistribution between young and old? more individual responsibility? By making use of the policy-mechanisms discussed before, the consequences of these strategies are discussed. |
Artikel |
Inleiding: De wonderbaarlijke terugkeer van Thomas MalthusOver bevolkingspolitiek in een krimpende wereld |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2008 |
Auteurs | Harry van Dalen en Ewald Engelen |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Culturen besturenHet (onzinnige) verlangen naar het 'maken' van tradities in lokaal bestuur |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2008 |
Auteurs | Mirko Noordegraaf en Jeroen Vermeulen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In local government, traditions and styles of working are under pressure. Local administrators try to find new methods to address urban matters in a business-like manner, to direct networks and to activate stakeholders. In that way, they strive for better performance, and for 'new' politics. In order to succeed, not only new methods are introduced, but cultures are changed as well and new traditions of governance are established. Existing styles of working and regular procedures are seen as outdated and considered to be barriers that have to be eliminated. This 'violence of renewal', as we call it, is based on several assumptions. First, new methods are seen as crucial for modernizing local governance. Second, the effects of new methods depend on the manner in which modernization takes place. Third, effective introductions of new methods do not happen straightforwardly; cultural change is required. In this article we will argue that these assumptions have to be put into perspective and, especially, that the idea of 'making' of cultures in order to effectively implement new methods is illusory. We show, based on research in four municipalities, that interventions in local governance as such are culturally biased, and that local traditions, styles and customs influence how modernization takes place. |
Artikel |
De overheid en duurzaam beleggenEen vergelijkende analyse tussen Nederland en België |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2008 |
Auteurs | Tim Benijts en Marleen Brans |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article examines the differences and similarities in public policy of the Dutch and Belgian government in the policy field of socially responsible investing (SRI). In particular the authors discuss both the content and the consequences of the Dutch arrangement 'Groen beleggen' and the Belgian 'Kringloopfonds'. Our empirical evidence states that, although both public policies are very similar (a tax incentive for investors investing financial means in socially responsible funds), they had a different influence on the socially responsible investment market. The Dutch arrangement 'Groen beleggen' lead to more assets under management, more green private funds, more financed projects and a bigger influence on the market of socially responsible investment products. This is mainly caused by the nature of the funding: the choice for private funds in the Netherlands, instead of a public fund like in Belgium. |