Since 2001, the Dutch province of Overijssel has had its own knowledge centre focusing on urban society, called the ‘KennisInstituut Stedelijke Samenleving’ (KISS), alongside national knowledge centres. This essay gives an overview of some relevant KISS meetings devoted to a many kinds of citizen participation. The overview is based on reports made by the author himself. Examples of citizen participation are: the new styles of neighbourhood governance, citizen participation through neighbourhood budgets, the strength of the city and location-based leadership, innovative urban renewal and the promotion of citizen initiatives in the province of Overijssel. Examples are not only from the province of Overijssel (situated in the east of the Netherlands), but also from other parts of the Netherlands and other countries (Flanders, United Kingdom, United States and all over the world). The subject of citizen participation (in connection with urban renewal and administrative leadership) enjoys an ever-increasing popularity as is shown by the number of KISS meetings devoted to this subject. |
Zoekresultaat: 5 artikelen
Jaar 2015 xDiscussie |
Burgerparticipatie, stedelijke vernieuwing en bestuurlijk leiderschap: inzichten via KISS |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 4 2015 |
Auteurs | Dr. Rik Reussing |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Vroeger voor vandaagHeden-verledenvergelijkingen voor praktisch gebruik |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2015 |
Trefwoorden | Past-present comparisons, methodology, Valorisation, History, Policy |
Auteurs | Dr. Anita Boele, Prof. dr. Arjan van Dixhoorn en Dr. ir. Pepijn van Houwelingen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this article we explore how and under what circumstances present-past comparisons can be used to find solutions to current social issues. We argue that meaningful comparisons can not only be made between countries or groups within countries, rather, comparisons between current and past societies too can enrich our thinking about pressing social problems. We search for the conditions under which such comparisons are possible without undermining the professional skills, epistemological and methodological insights of the various disciplines. Learning from the past calls for an in-depth study of present problems and the historical (role) model alike, with historians and social and political scientists cooperating in teams. We propose a five-step-method: (1) diagnosing the social issue, (2) tracing comparable historical practices that might offer solutions, (3) distilling these practices from their historical contexts, (4) massaging the ‘historical’ practices into the diagnosed present-day context through an imaginative exercise, and (5) implementing these solutions into everyday life through forms of experiment. |
Artikel |
Bevlogen en begrensdDe rol van lokale politici achter de schermen van de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2015 |
Trefwoorden | local politics, municipal elections, Campaign, Politicians |
Auteurs | Dr. Julien van Ostaaijen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Dutch voters have little interest in local politics and are not aware of the political activities that take place behind the screens of the local elections. However, compared to the many people with little interest in local elections, there is a small group of people, the local politicians, that is very much involved in it. The central research question in this article is: How do the local (political) processes and activities related to the municipal elections of 2014, from the campaign to the coalition negotiations, look like and develop? The question is answered by systematically looking at the local election programmes, the local candidates, the local election campaign, the electoral results and coalition formation, and the role of non-local actors. The conclusion is presented in five images of the local/municipal elections: the local election as a quest for attention, the local election as a search for differences, the local election as the national election’s little brother, the local election as an interference in coalition negotiations, and the local election as a spectacle provided by local enthusiasts. |
Artikel |
Actief burgerschap en leefbaarheid in twee Rotterdamse wijken |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 2 2015 |
Auteurs | Dr. Erik Snel, Kim Hoogmoed MSc en Dr. Arend Odé |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Modern government has high expectations of active citizen participation. Sociologists however, expect that this emphasis on citizen participation leads to new inequalities between city neighbourhoods. In ‘better’ neighbourhoods relatively more inhabitants are higher educated and indigenous, categories that are traditionally more active in society. In vulnerable neighbourhoods on the other hand many of the inhabitants are non-indigenous, lower educated and unemployed, who – as is shown in research – participate less. Citizen initiatives therefore would prosper in neighbourhoods with resilient and competent citizens and a powerful social fabric, while inhabitants of the vulnerable neighbourhoods would participate less, although there is more need for active citizen participation, because of their problems. This study analyses active citizen participation in two neighbourhoods in the Dutch city of Rotterdam, ‘Schiemond’ and ‘Lloydkwartier’, a typical backward neighbourhood versus a typical neighbourhood for young urban professionals (‘yuppen’). In contrast with the expectations the inhabitants of Schiemond do not appear to participate less than the inhabitants of Lloydkwartier. Concerning matters of neighbourhood safety even more respondents participate in Schiemond than in Lloydkwartier. Possible reasons are: (a) that lower educated people do participate more often in informal neighbourhood initiatives; (b) that because of the average longer residency in Schiemond there is a greater amount of public familiarity in this neighbourhood; or (c) that because of the bigger problems in Schiemond there is a greater necessity for inhabitants to become active themselves. |
Symposium |
Euthanasie: gaat het nog wel goed in de Lage Landen? |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 2 2015 |
Auteurs | Gerbert van Loenen, Heleen Weyers en Herman Nys |
Auteursinformatie |