In this article we explore how and under what circumstances present-past comparisons can be used to find solutions to current social issues. We argue that meaningful comparisons can not only be made between countries or groups within countries, rather, comparisons between current and past societies too can enrich our thinking about pressing social problems. We search for the conditions under which such comparisons are possible without undermining the professional skills, epistemological and methodological insights of the various disciplines. Learning from the past calls for an in-depth study of present problems and the historical (role) model alike, with historians and social and political scientists cooperating in teams. We propose a five-step-method: (1) diagnosing the social issue, (2) tracing comparable historical practices that might offer solutions, (3) distilling these practices from their historical contexts, (4) massaging the ‘historical’ practices into the diagnosed present-day context through an imaginative exercise, and (5) implementing these solutions into everyday life through forms of experiment. |
Artikel |
Vroeger voor vandaagHeden-verledenvergelijkingen voor praktisch gebruik |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2015 |
Trefwoorden | Past-present comparisons, methodology, Valorisation, History, Policy |
Auteurs | Dr. Anita Boele, Prof. dr. Arjan van Dixhoorn en Dr. ir. Pepijn van Houwelingen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
De democratische vertegenwoordiging van cliënten en patiënten bij de decentralisaties |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2015 |
Trefwoorden | representative claim, democratic decision making, Decentralization, social and health policies, Municipalities |
Auteurs | Dr. Hester Van de Bovenkamp en Dr. Hans Vollaard |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Citizen participation is firmly on the agenda of many Western policy makers. Numerous opportunities for individuals to participate in public decision-making have been created. However, few citizens use these opportunities. Those who do are often the highly educated, white, middle and upper classes that also tend to dominate other democratic spaces. Opportunities to become active can increase inequalities in terms of whose voices are heard in public decision-making. This fundamentally challenges the central democratic value of equality. Nevertheless, others can represent the interests of those who remain silent. Using the concept of representative claim this paper explores a variety of forms of representation (electoral, formal non-electoral and informal self-appointed) in the domain of social policy which is currently decentralized in the Netherlands. We conclude that especially informal self-appointed representatives such as medical professionals, churches and patient organizations can potentially play an important role in representing groups who often remain unheard in the public debate. They can therefore play an important role in ensuring the democratic quality of the decentralization process. |
Casus |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2015 |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Wouter Van der Brug en Dr. Tom Van der Meer |
Auteursinformatie |