Reflection & debate initiates academically inspired discussions on issues that are on the current policy agenda. |
Zoekresultaat: 150 artikelen
De zoekresultaten worden gefilterd op:Tijdschrift Beleid en Maatschappij x
Reflectie & debat |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2022 |
Auteurs | Wouter Mensink en Amber Bosse |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Boekensignalement |
Wat we vertellen door hoe we tellen |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2022 |
Auteurs | Mark van Ostaijen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors review recently published books on subjects of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Artikel |
Klokkenluiden in de wetenschapIn het hol van de leeuw |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering Online First 2022 |
Trefwoorden | whistleblowing, research integrity, research misconduct, retaliation, stress |
Auteurs | Steven De Peuter en Gert Storms |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Research integrity has received increased attention, in the literature as well as in policy. A host of initiatives is supporting its promotion. However, misconduct will not cease to exist and needs to be reported, by whistleblowers. It takes a lot of courage to blow the whistle as it can have an enormous impact on the whistleblower’s career and personal well-being – and that of colleagues and researchers associated with the perpetrator. Therefore, it is important to be cognisant of the stressful process that accompanies the act of whistleblowing, to provide clear and accessible procedures to report misconduct, and to support whistleblowers throughout the process. Furthermore, it is essential that appropriate whistleblower protection measures are in place and enforced. Based on the current review of the literature, we provide some recommendations for policy and argue that an obligation to report scientific misconduct would currently do more harm than good. |
Dossier |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2022 |
Auteurs | Duco Bannink |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors discuss recent research findings that are of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Dossier |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2022 |
Auteurs | Tamara Metze |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors discuss recent research findings that are of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Dossier |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2021 |
Auteurs | Meike Bokhorst |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors discuss recent research findings that are of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Dossier |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2021 |
Auteurs | Jeff Handmaker en Sanne Taekema |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors discuss recent research findings that are of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Artikel |
Transitietheorie in de beleidspraktijkVan cherry picking naar robuuste onderbouwing |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2021 |
Trefwoorden | Transition policy, Social change theory, Sustainability, Normativity, Energy policy |
Auteurs | Albert Faber |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Policy makers who work on sustainability transitions are well informed by transition science. As many scientific disciplines transition science comprises several theories and schools of thought, with distinct concepts and logical frames. The implication is that we can distinguish – subtle and implicit – different normative assumptions about, e.g., role of government, theory of social change, object of policy and issues of power. Such normative assumptions could then translate into policy, often without a proper assessment. This article aims to make such normative assumptions in transition theories more explicit. I explore how these normative elements translate into actual transition policy in a case of Dutch policy for ‘regional energy strategies’. Revealing normative elements in transition policy (or any policy field) can help policy makers to avoid pitfalls of conceptual cherry picking, thus contributing to transition policy that is scientifically and normatively robust. |
Dossier |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2021 |
Auteurs | Imrat Verhoeven |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors discuss recent research findings that are of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Dossier |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2021 |
Auteurs | Frank Hendriks |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors discuss recent research findings that are of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Dossier |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2021 |
Auteurs | Kristof Jacobs |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors discuss recent research findings that are of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Artikel |
Hoe SyRI het belang van transparantie onderstreept |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2021 |
Trefwoorden | SyRI, digitisation, transparency, trust, ICT |
Auteurs | Tosja Selbach en Barbara Brink |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Dutch digital fraud detection system SyRI was announced to set up to detect social security fraud quickly and effectively and by doing so, maintain support for the social security system. It was the formal position that for the sake of effectiveness, no information about the algorithm and very limited information about the application of the system should be shared. The authors argue on the basis of a policy analysis, a legal exploration and a literature study that the lack of transparency about the chosen method and the application of the digital fraud detection system in social security can have far-reaching consequences for both the individual and society . The information sharing and the use of algorithms can lead to suspicion of and declining confidence in the government, and a reduced motivation to comply with the prevailing rules. This could undermine the original purpose. |
Dossier |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2021 |
Auteurs | Sofie Dreef MSc, Prof. dr. Caspar van den Berg en Annelien Zaal MA |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors discuss recent research findings that are of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Dossier |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2021 |
Trefwoorden | Covid-19, Democracy, Trust, information environment |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Rens Vliegenthart, Dr. Bert N. Bakker en Prof. dr. Claes de Vreese |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Combatting the coronavirus politicians and policy makers have to continuously make a trade-off between public health and democratic rights. How do citizens’ attitudes towards democracy develop in a pandemic? In this study we test whether changes in the information environment affect citizens’ trust in the local and national government. Moreover, we study whether changes in the information environment are associated with the perceptions about the extent to which democratic processes are under pressure. We address these questions using a five wave panel study in the Netherlands conducted between April and September 2020. We find that during this period media use and political trust decreased. Moreover, Dutch citizens are worried about the effects of the corona crisis on local and national democracy. When it comes to the effects of media use on political trust and attitudes towards democracy, we find that media use has a limited effect on attitudes towards democracy. If anything, consuming news via the public broadcaster has a positive effect on political trust. To conclude, our study provides descriptive evidence about the development of attitudes towards democracy in the Netherlands during a major public health crisis. Dutch citizens are worried about democracy but media play a limited role in amplifying or reducing these worries. |
Dossier |
Een procesrecht voor de 21ste eeuw |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Auteurs | Dr. Bart van der Sloot |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | dirty data, predictive policing, CAS, discrimination, ethnic profiling |
Auteurs | Mr. Abhijit Das en Mr. dr. Marc Schuilenburg |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Predictive tools as instruments for understanding and responding to risky behaviour as early as possible are increasingly becoming a normal feature in local and state agencies. A risk that arises from the implementation of these predictive tools is the problem of dirty data. The input of incorrect or illegally obtained information (‘dirty data’) can influence the quality of the predictions used by local and state agencies, such as the police. The article focuses on the risks of dirty data in predictive policing by the Dutch Police. It describes the possibilities to prevent dirty data from being used in predictive policing tools, such as the Criminality Anticipation System (CAS). It concludes by emphasizing the importance of transparency for any serious solution looking to eliminate the use of dirty data in predictive policing. |
Dossier |
Energie en democratie: democratische invloed op regionale energiestrategieën en andere complexe besluitvormingsprocessen |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | multilevel governance, Democracy, sustainability |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Marcel Boogers |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article clarifies the democratic problems of multilevel governance, with a focus on the Regional Energy Strategy decision-making process. First, the risks that these democratic problems entail for democratic support and for the quality and speed of decision-making are discussed. Next, these problems – and their possible solutions – are discussed by means of three approaches to democracy: representative democracy, pluralist democracy and participatory democracy. A tailor-made mix of these three approaches is recommended as most useful for a solid democratic anchorage of multilevel governance. |
Dossier |
Schaal en invloedPleidooi voor een symbiose van directe en indirecte democratie |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Democracy, Direct democracy, Indirect democracy, Representative democracy, Participation |
Auteurs | Drs. Boudewijn Steur |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In a democracy citizens should actually have influence on the choices that directly influence their lives. Citizens have two ways for this influence: directly by participating in the policy process (in its formulation, its decision making or its implementation) or indirectly by voting for a political party or representatives through which citizens have influence on the outcomes. These two are not opposite to each other, but rather complementary. My main argument in this article is that the smaller the scale, the greater the possibilities for citizens to exert direct influence. The larger the scale, the more important it is that this influence runs through their representative institutions |
Dossier |
Eis de regio op: regionale democratie in de energietransitie |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | regional democracy, Participation, energy transition |
Auteurs | Annajorien Prins MSc en Ruben van de Belt MSc MA |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The roadmap to the energy transition of the Netherlands in the next decade is formulated by and large at the regional level. 30 regions are currently developing a Regional Energy Strategy (RES), which lays out where renewable energy projects can be realized in the future. But how democratic are these regional energy strategies? In this article we share our observations and reflections, based on our professional experiences with the regional energy strategies. |
Artikel |
Over Rousseau, goede burgers en de participatiesamenlevingEen normatieve analyse van het nieuwe contractdenken van de Nederlandse overheid door de ogen van een klassieke contractdenker |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2019 |
Trefwoorden | Beleidsevaluatie, Burgerschap, Participatiesamenleving, Rousseau, Sociaal contract |
Auteurs | Dr. Yvonne Kleistra |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In the Netherlands good citizenship has become a topic of increased importance on the government agenda since the murder of Pim Fortuyn. The author assesses the effectiveness of the Dutch citizenship policies within the context of the broader policy framework of the so-called participatory society (participatiesamenleving) or do-democracy (doe-democratie). The evaluative analysis consists of two parts. In the first part the changing ideas concerning good citizenship are identified as well as the normative assumptions that are at the basis of Dutch citizenship policies. In the second part, the potential of current policies, and in particular the ideas that gave rise to creating a new social contract between government and society are assessed. To this end some key aspects of the new contract thinking of the Dutch government are contrasted with the ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. The findings show that the current strive for tangible agreements on citizen behavior and civic duties is at odds with the main principles of classic contract theory. This leads to the conclusion that the new contractualism that is at the basis of the Dutch citizen policies should rather be seen as a threat to a stable society than as a building block for good citizenship. |