This article looks at national political institutions and euroscepticism. Over a timespan of 25 years, I compare values for majoritarian vs consensus democracy for 14 European democracies, with measures for euroscepticism at the levels of party systems, elections and public opinion. Consistent with the thesis that consensus democracy generates more system-opposition at the national level, this regime type is also more sensitive to euroscepticism. This is not the case, however, for France and the UK, two very eurosceptic majoritarian democracies. The study also shows that a context of socio-economic crisis (2008-2014) turns this relationship around, as increased conflict within society demands for more consensus at the elite level. The study essentially argues that euroscepticism still is ‘a touchstone of dissent’ for national politics. However, the extent to which national democracies generate this dissent, and especially, whether it is channelled by eurosceptic parties, depends on the dominance of consensus in the domestic institutional context. |
Article |
‘A touchstone of consent?’Euroscepticisme in consensusdemocratieën |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 4 2016 |
Trefwoorden | euroscepticism, consensus democracy, political trust, national institutions |
Auteurs | Louise Hoon |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Article |
Benadrukken partijen eigen thema’s in verkiezingstijd?Een onderzoek naar thematische aandacht van Nederlandse partijen rond de verkiezingen van 1994 tot en met 2012 |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 3 2016 |
Trefwoorden | issue ownership, elections, Netherlands, political parties, issue convergence |
Auteurs | Fleur Vis en Jonas Lefevere |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Issue ownership theory argues that the public considers some parties as more capable to handle certain issues. Issue ownership is important, because parties tend to receive more votes if their owned issues dominate the campaign. Consequently, issue ownership theory expects parties to emphasize issues they own, while ignoring issues owned by their competitors. This study investigates to what extent Dutch parties emphasized issues they own, before and after the seven Dutch national elections held between 1994 and 2012. It uses a detailed content analysis of four Dutch newspapers, that tracked parties’ issue attention. The results show that parties tend to emphasize owned issues more, both compared to other issues and compared to their competitors. A surprising finding is that parties tend to emphasize owned issues more during the formation period compared to the campaign. Moreover, government parties emphasize owned issues less than opposition parties. |
Article |
De invloed van verkiezingen op politiek vertrouwenEen analyse van een verkiezingspanel in België, 2009-2014 |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 3 2016 |
Trefwoorden | procedural fairness theory, political trust, internal political efficacy, elections, Belgium |
Auteurs | Dieter Stiers en Marc Hooghe |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Elections are routinely investigated with a focus on the way in which winners or losers of the elections are different in their attitudes towards the political system. There is no previous research on the general impact of participation in the electoral process on support for the political system. In this study, we hypothesize – based on the procedural fairness theory – that participating in elections raises the voter’s political trust, irrespective of the result of the party s/he voted for. Furthermore, we expect this impact to be largest for voters with the lowest level of internal political efficacy. These expectations are investigated using the Belgian election panel (2009-2014) study, observing political trust before and after the elections in two consecutive electoral cycles. The results provide support for all proposed hypotheses, highlighting the importance of general participation in elections for democratic legitimacy. |
Article |
Vragen naar de bekende weg?Een analyse van informatiebronnen waarop schriftelijke vragen over Europese zaken in de Nederlandse Tweede Kamer zijn gebaseerd |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 2 2016 |
Trefwoorden | national parliaments, European Union, parliamentary questions, the Netherlands |
Auteurs | Rik de Ruiter, Jelmer Schalk en Yorick van Rijthoven |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This paper analyses the information sources members of the Dutch Lower House base their questions on with regard to EU affairs in the period 1995-2013. Knowledge of the type of information sources to base questions on is vital for determining what the conditions are under which members of national parliaments can scrutinize the decisions taken by the national government at the EU level. The involvement of national parliaments in EU affairs is according to many scholars a necessary condition for closing the democratic deficit of the European Union, especially when the turnout in elections for the European Parliament remains low and for national parliaments remains stable and relatively high. An original dataset is constructed including all sets of written parliamentary questions on EU affairs asked by Dutch MPs in the period 1995-2013, categorized by different types of information sources on which the question is based. These different categories of information sources are regressed with a variable measuring the Treaty changes impacting on the intensity of contact between MPs of different national parliaments and several variables measuring the characteristics of Dutch MPs and their parties. The findings indicate that Dutch MPs base their written questions primarily on coverage on EU affairs by national newspapers. Moreover, MPs are more likely to use sources rooted in a national context for asking questions when they are a member of a party with a negative attitude towards European integration. These findings imply that parliamentary control via written questions over the decisions of the national executive at the EU level can be strengthened by increasing national media coverage on EU affairs, allowing the EU public sphere to develop further in the future. |
Symposium |
De rekruteringsfunctie van partijen in gevaar? |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 2 2016 |
Auteurs | Gerrit Voerman, Bram Wauters, Jeroen van der Kolk e.a. |
Auteursinformatie |
Article |
Het effect van politieke sofisticatie op de (intentie tot) opkomst bij eerste- en tweederangsverkiezingen in België en Nederland |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 1 2016 |
Trefwoorden | political sophistication, first- and second-order elections, turnout |
Auteurs | Dieter Stiers |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this paper we investigate the effect of political sophistication on turnout and whether this effect differs in second-order national elections. Political sophistication is thought to influence turnout because the more sophisticated voters have access to more information about the electoral and the party system. In this paper, we start from the expectation that these effects should be even stronger in the context of secondorder national elections, where information about the stakes of the election is not readily available. We analyse citizens’ willingness to turn out to vote at different levels of government in Belgium and the Netherlands. The results show that a higher degree of political sophistication increases the probability to turn out at the national as well as the European level. Our expectation that this effect would be larger at the European level, however, is not supported by these results. |
Research Note |
Het effect van gemeentegrootte en lokale mandaten op het electorale succes van Belgische/Vlaamse verkiezingskandidaten: een multilevelanalyse |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 1 2016 |
Auteurs | Gert-Jan Put en Bart Maddens |
Auteursinformatie |