Whereas the six Dutch islands in the Caribbean all have a (very) limited population size, analyses of political problems on the islands rarely seem to take the variable of state size into account. The available academic literature demonstrates that the population size of states has a strong influence on the quality of democratic governance, although scholars disagree on the question whether smallness is an asset or an obstacle to democratic development. After a discussion of this theoretical literature, the present article proceeds with a presentation of field research in three small island states (St. Kitts and Nevis, Seychelles, and Palau) in which the political consequences of a limited population size are analyzed. This analysis reveals that a number of size-related effects can be observed in all three examined island states, among which a tendency to personalistic competition, strong polarization between parties and politicians, particularistic relationships between voters and their representatives, and a dominant position of the political executive vis-à-vis other institutions. A subsequent analysis of the contemporary political situation on the Dutch Caribbean islands shows that the observed problems also play a role on these islands, which indicates that smallness is perhaps of greater significance than is now often supposed. |
Zoekresultaat: 6 artikelen
Jaar 2013 xArtikel |
Klein maar fijn?De effecten van kleinschaligheid op het karakter van politiek en democratie |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2013 |
Trefwoorden | State Size, Dutch Caribbean Islands, Democracy, Good Governance, Personalistic Politics |
Auteurs | Dr. Wouter Veenendaal |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Co-regulering: niet doen! Of toch?Een essay over de beoordeling van co-regulering vanuit twee interpretaties van governance |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 3 2013 |
Trefwoorden | co-regulation, inspection, governance, assessment |
Auteurs | Haiko van der Voort |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Public regulators and inspectorates are increasingly involved in self-regulatory initiatives. This contribution is about co-regulation, which are co-ordination efforts among public regulators and self-regulating institutions. In co-regulation arrangements typical regulation and oversight activities, such as standard setting, information gathering and sanctioning become subjects of co-ordination between public and private actors. Co-regulation arrangements are typically network efforts. At the same time ‘regulation’ has a hierarchical connotation. This paradox shows in interpretations of ‘governance’ and ‘the move from government to governance’, the latter being a popular phrase qualifying a change of the government’s role in society. Main question in this paper is what the changing role of government in society means for the assessment of co-regulation. Based on literature two implicit, but opposing interpretations of ‘governance’ and the change are described. This implicitness may cause unsound assessments of co-regulation, either too tough or too lenient. In this contribution the normative implications of both interpretations are made explicit for co-regulation. The argument is illustrated by the case of co-regulation in the Dutch coach travel industry. |
Artikel |
Borging van het publiek belang in samenwerkingsverbandenDe rol van intermediairs bij de verlaging van de implementatiekosten van overheidsbeleid |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2013 |
Trefwoorden | public interest,, transaction costs, public private partnership, government information, intermediation |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Frank Den Butter en Sjoerd Ten Wolde MSc S.A. |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
A public interest implies that government intervention is needed in order to enhance societal welfare. After the character of the public interest has been determined from the theoretical perspective of public economics, the government has the responsibility to safeguard the public interest at lowest societal costs. This article discusses the supportive role of intermediaries (or ‘middlemen’), using prescriptions from transaction management. A discussion of three case studies shows how in public private partnerships the knowledge of such intermediaries can be used in order to safeguard the public interest in an efficient manner. |
Artikel |
De normaalste zaak van de wereld?Grensoverschrijdende attitudes van Nederlandse politiefunctionarissen |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 2 2013 |
Trefwoorden | policing, attitudes, European Union, cross-border |
Auteurs | Jeroen Candel en Sebastiaan Princen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Because of the blurring of the European internal borders, combating crime is demanding closer cross-border collaboration between police forces. For that reason, the Dutch police have expressed the objective that dealing with cases with an international component should be an integral part of the job for every police officer. This study focuses on the attitudes of Dutch police officers regarding cross-border policing, and seeks to determine which factors have the greatest effect on those attitudes. This attitude approach contrasts with more traditional, top-down approaches, by shifting the focus to micro dynamics on the individual level. The methods chosen for addressing this research objective consist of semi-structured interviews and observations. The results show that the current attitude of Dutch police officers is mainly determined by the extent to which they have had to deal with international issues in their daily work. Although strong organization-wide attitudes towards cross-border policing are not likely to arise, much could still be gained by facilitating cross-border experiences and making more coherent efforts at socialization. |
Artikel |
Groengasprojecten: energietransitie in ruraal Nederland? |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2013 |
Trefwoorden | green gas, Biogas, renewable energy, stakeholder analysis, climate policy |
Auteurs | Drs. Maurits Sanders en Dr. Thomas Hoppe |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
‘Green gas’ is a sustainable alternative to natural gas. It is produced by converting biomass into biogas, which can consequently be upgraded to natural gas standards. Expectations about green gas are high. According to the long term vision of Netbeheer Nederland, the representative association of gas grid operators, green gas will entail 50 percent of the domestic gas mixture by 2050. In line with this vision national government has adopted a green gas innovation support program. Production of green gas takes place in rural areas with abundant supply of organic production resources, especially manure. It is in demonstration projects that green gas niche development is to be proven. In this paper the central question is how green gas demonstration projects manifest at the local level. By conducting a stakeholder analysis, we take a ‘bottom-up’ research approach, which helps us to identify organizational and institutional barriers key local stakeholders have in relation to green gas demonstration projects. We judge this necessary to further understanding in green gas niche development. The results of the analysis are used to advice policymakers about design and use of policy instruments which can help to solve these barriers. |
Artikel |
De realisatie van publieke waarden door sociaal ondernemerschap |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 1 2013 |
Trefwoorden | social entrepreneurship, public value, government, governance |
Auteurs | Martin Schulz, Martijn van der Steen en Mark van Twist |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article discusses the realization of public value through social entrepreneurship. It shows practices that can at present be seen in the Dutch society and answers the question: what is the relation between social entrepreneurship and the realization of value in the public domain? We conclude that public value is at the same time the result of the efforts of a social entrepreneur (person) in the beginning of his endeavors, the presupposition for social entrepreneurship (activity) in the phase of growth and the good that is preserved by the social enterprise (organization) by the time it has matured. In realizing public value social entrepreneurs come into contact with government. For government this encounter has quite an awkward nature since government has at the same time both a say (it is responsible for policy) and no say (it is not responsible for individual social entrepreneurial initiatives) regarding the realization of value in the public domain through social entrepreneurship. |