This introductory article sketches the problématique of this special issue on ‘Subsidiarity in the European Union and beyond’. It starts with a short historical overview of the origins, meanings and implementation of the subsidiarity principle within the EU. Subsequently, it problematizes the concept and application of subsidiarity in a multilevel governance context by examining two fundamental characteristics of this essentially contested concept that render it fascinating to study: its complexity and power-relevance. The relatively new concept of global subsidiarity is briefly discussed to situate the intra-EU discussion in a wider context. This introduction ends by discussing some of the findings of the special issue’s two substantial articles – that both deal with policy topics in which different competence regimes meet – in light of the subsidiarity problématique. |
Introduction |
Personalisering van de politiek: een multidimensioneel begrip |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 1 2015 |
Auteurs | Peter Van Aelst en Kees Aarts |
Auteursinformatie |
Introduction |
Subsidiariteit in de EU en verder |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 1 2012 |
Trefwoorden | European Union, subsidiarity, multilevel governance, complexity, power |
Auteurs | Ferdi De Ville en Jan Loisen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Introduction |
Het referendum in de consensusdemocratie |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 1 2009 |
Trefwoorden | referendum, consensus democracy |
Auteurs | Martin Rosema |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This special issue about the practice of local referendums in the Netherlands and Flanders, Belgium, focuses in particular on the relationship between referendums and the consensus model of democracy. On the one hand, referendums are widely conceived of as a typical majoritarian device. On the other hand, the legal possibility of referendums forces political elites to reach broad agreement, in order to prevent a popular vote in which decisions would be recalled. The three contributions to this issue demonstrate that consensus democracy influences the debate about referendums in the legislative, as well as how the practicalities are organised, in more varied ways. Studies of independent referendum bodies in the Netherlands and question wording in referendums in Flanders show that the nature of consensus democracy enables both countries to find solutions to potential problems, but also brings new problems. Guidelines for how these may be prevented in future referendums are provided. |