An element of the theme of the VNG 2018 ‘Across boundaries’ annual conference in Maastricht is the necessity for Dutch politicians and administrators to push existing boundaries. In many cases this will involve a national border, which is closer in the region than in the national administrative center in The Hague. More than half of the twelve Dutch provinces have national borders, so cross-border cooperation is a regular phenomenon. National or EU regulations and subsidies may help to realize policy goals that are found important at a regional or local level, but when policy crosses national borders in practice it is also confronted with other ‘European’ boundaries. If there are incomprehensible, impracticable or conflicting rules, there is tension between common European policy and Dutch decentralization. Therefore this essay focuses on the control that the European Union has as an administrative challenge. It first discusses the shaky European consciousness and then the actions taken to break this vicious circle. |
Discussie |
|
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 2 2018 |
Auteurs | Dr. Mendeltje van Keulen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Discussie |
Reflectie & debat: Aan Ton Kreukels |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2006 |
Auteurs | Hans Blokland |
Auteursinformatie |
Discussie |
100 dagen onder het volk |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2007 |
Auteurs | Len de Klerk |
Auteursinformatie |
Discussie |
A Global, Community Building Language? |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2007 |
Auteurs | Amitai Etzioni |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Although long recognized as beneficial, a global language has not come to fruition despite considerable past efforts. A major reason is that many policy makers and citizens fear that such a universal language would undermine the particularistic, constituting primary languages of local and national communities. This dilemma can be greatly diminished by a two tier approach, in which efforts to protect the primary language will be intensified but all the nations involved would agree to use the same second language as the global one. Although theoretically the UN or some other such body could choose such a language, in effect English is increasingly occupying this position. However, policies that are in place slow down the development of a global language, often based on the mistaken assumption that people can readily gain fluency in several languages. |
Discussie |
SPIN of spin? De politiek van het netwerk-denken |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2009 |
Auteurs | Marieke de Goede |
Auteursinformatie |