In a democracy citizens should actually have influence on the choices that directly influence their lives. Citizens have two ways for this influence: directly by participating in the policy process (in its formulation, its decision making or its implementation) or indirectly by voting for a political party or representatives through which citizens have influence on the outcomes. These two are not opposite to each other, but rather complementary. My main argument in this article is that the smaller the scale, the greater the possibilities for citizens to exert direct influence. The larger the scale, the more important it is that this influence runs through their representative institutions |
Dossier |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Auteurs | Dr. Emily Miltenburg |
Auteursinformatie |
Dossier |
Schaal en invloedPleidooi voor een symbiose van directe en indirecte democratie |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Democracy, Direct democracy, Indirect democracy, Representative democracy, Participation |
Auteurs | Drs. Boudewijn Steur |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Dossier |
Eis de regio op: regionale democratie in de energietransitie |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | regional democracy, Participation, energy transition |
Auteurs | Annajorien Prins MSc en Ruben van de Belt MSc MA |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The roadmap to the energy transition of the Netherlands in the next decade is formulated by and large at the regional level. 30 regions are currently developing a Regional Energy Strategy (RES), which lays out where renewable energy projects can be realized in the future. But how democratic are these regional energy strategies? In this article we share our observations and reflections, based on our professional experiences with the regional energy strategies. |
Dossier |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Labour market, Dividing lines, Policy feasibility, Participation Act, Sustainable employability |
Auteurs | Dr. ir. Maroesjka Versantvoort en Prof. dr. Kim Putters |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Recent developments on the Dutch labour market raise questions about the emergence of new social dividing lines. In this paper we discuss two cases. Both address labour market disadvantages which can easily deepen and sharpen with unchanged policies. The first case shows that there are groups that are less able to respond to the defined trends in the labour market due to a lack of education or disabilities. In the second case we focus on the question of sustainable employability as such that creates dividing lines. A first conclusion from our contribution is that a thorough analysis of existing dividing lines in the labour market is crucial for effective policy, but that knowledge about deepening old and creating new dividing lines is at least as relevant. A second conclusion is that the outlined assumptions in policies around self-reliance of, for example, people with a disability or the possibilities of employers to realize sheltered work and to focus on retraining, for example outside working hours, are not always realistic. Much more will have to be done to match the real possibilities of people and organizations to achieve this. Financial, but also organizational and personal. The motivations and behaviors of employees, employers and educational authorities appear to be very relevant explanatory factors in practice, which are often not sufficiently taken into account. Recent experiences with the Participation Act and lifelong learning show us that. More interaction is needed in the coming years between research, policy and the practice of the labour market. |
Dossier |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Gender diversity, Public administration, Ethnic diversity, Inclusion, Emancipation, Leadership |
Auteurs | Dr. Saniye Çelik |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article reflects on the proposed measures of the Dutch Government to increase the number of women in the Dutch public administration. Based on the lessons learned from the practice of the public sector, this study concludes that there is still much work to be done with regard to female participation in the Netherlands, but when it comes to the ethnic minorities, the situation is alarming. Politicians directly elected by the citizen, such as MPs and councillors, do see a representation of the ethnic diversity of society. Where the citizen has no direct influence, such as the king’s commissioners, mayors, and aldermen, the percentages are zero or slightly higher than zero. It is argued that mechanisms such as selection procedures are hindering gender and ethnic diversity at the top of the public organizations. It is, therefore, suggested that introducing quota could bring more diversity in public administration. |