Nowadays municipalities in the Netherlands work together more intensively with other municipalities in the region. Also cooperation with companies, institutions and societal organizations is more often looked for at the regional level. In practice this brings along many problems and difficulties. For several reasons it appears not to be easy to combine the implementation strengths of municipalities and societal partners. This article presents a new approach (based on the theory of ‘new regionalism’) to regional implementation strength. This approach is not only about designing regional administrations, but is mainly about the factors that induce administrations as well as companies and institutions to commit themselves jointly for the region. To increase the regional implementation strength more is needed than the formation of a regional administrative structure in which municipalities do not cooperate in a non-committal manner. To induce municipalities and societal partners to commit themselves jointly to handling new tasks or new challenges it is also necessary to have a clear strategic vision on these issues that binds parties and makes them enthusiastic and that regional cooperation is rooted in a societal breeding ground. It also asks for an administrative structure that does justice to the contribution every municipality and societal partner makes to the realization of the strategy and for a democratic involvement of municipal councils and sector-based interest groups. |
Artikel |
Strategie, structuur en samenleving: drie dimensies van regionale uitvoeringskracht |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 2 2014 |
Auteurs | Marcel Boogers |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
De bestuurlijke organisatie in Nederland: spanningsvelden en veranderstrategieën |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 1 2014 |
Trefwoorden | nation state, structural reforms, decentralisation |
Auteurs | Cees Paardekooper en Harry ter Braak |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Dutch Minister for the Interior Ronald Plasterk has proposed far-reaching reforms for the structuring of the Dutch nation state. These reforms include decentralising tasks to municipalities and merging several provinces. So far, these plans have met with criticism and derision. This article discusses the tensions included in Plasterk’s plans and proposes several strategies for how change could still be possible. |
Artikel |
De grote verbouwingEen bestuurskundig perspectief op veranderingen in stelsels van publieke voorzieningen |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 1 2014 |
Trefwoorden | public management reform, New Public Management, New Public Governance |
Auteurs | Philip Marcel Karré en Cees Paardekooper |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Netherlands is engaged in reforming several of its public service provision sectors by limiting their hybrid (mixed public/private) character. This special issue deals with these reforms. We have a closer look at the systems of transport, education and housing, and also discuss reforms of the Dutch nation state. Each article poses three basic questions: why has the sector evolved as it has? Why is change seen as necessary? And how does this process take place? By doing so, we draw general lessons on how the Netherlands deals with system change and public management reform. |