In the near future, the Dutch government intends to change the rules relating to smoking bans in the hospitality industry again. After a complete ban, coming into force in July 2008, and introducing an exception for small bars in June 2011, the complete ban will return this year. This article describes the law regarding smoking bans in the Netherlands, and reports along researches of the relevant authority and a commercial research institute the effectiveness of the bans. From these findings it becomes clear that the hospitality industry did a good job in complying with the bans. But there is one exception: small bars. Next we explain, based on the ideas of Kagan and Skolnick and Elias the effectiveness of smoking bans. |
Artikel |
Over rijdende treinen en vallende dominostenen: het rookverbod in de Nederlandse horeca |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2014 |
Trefwoorden | smoking ban, regulation, support, effectiveness, explanations |
Auteurs | Dr. Heleen Weyers en Willem Bantema MSc |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Het ongrijpbare onbehagen |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2014 |
Trefwoorden | Discontent, Public opinion, (Social) media, Democracy, Civil society |
Auteurs | Dr. Dieneke de Ruiter en Jasper Zuure MSc |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Since Pim Fortuyn, discontent has become a central issue in public and political debates in the Netherlands. The government tries to ban out all risks and polarisation between citizens, because it fears this will have a destabilising impact on society. However, these measures do not seem to decrease discontent. In this article, we analyse why discontent so persistently keeps dominating debates. We argue that it is prominently and continuously expressed due to the position of opinion polls and the interaction between politicians, journalists and citizens and due to the platform that social media offer. But meanwhile, means to convert discontent into constructive, collective action are diminishing. As a result we continuously gather superficial information about people’s discontent. In order not to hinder constructive debates with this kind of information, as happens in current political discussions, different and more detailed information about the public opinion is needed. Politicians and researchers should make a more clear distinction between discontent itself and the incapacity of citizens to deal with it. Moreover, a revitalisation of the role of civil organisations is important to channel discontent. |
Artikel |
Klein maar fijn?De effecten van kleinschaligheid op het karakter van politiek en democratie |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2013 |
Trefwoorden | State Size, Dutch Caribbean Islands, Democracy, Good Governance, Personalistic Politics |
Auteurs | Dr. Wouter Veenendaal |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Whereas the six Dutch islands in the Caribbean all have a (very) limited population size, analyses of political problems on the islands rarely seem to take the variable of state size into account. The available academic literature demonstrates that the population size of states has a strong influence on the quality of democratic governance, although scholars disagree on the question whether smallness is an asset or an obstacle to democratic development. After a discussion of this theoretical literature, the present article proceeds with a presentation of field research in three small island states (St. Kitts and Nevis, Seychelles, and Palau) in which the political consequences of a limited population size are analyzed. This analysis reveals that a number of size-related effects can be observed in all three examined island states, among which a tendency to personalistic competition, strong polarization between parties and politicians, particularistic relationships between voters and their representatives, and a dominant position of the political executive vis-à-vis other institutions. A subsequent analysis of the contemporary political situation on the Dutch Caribbean islands shows that the observed problems also play a role on these islands, which indicates that smallness is perhaps of greater significance than is now often supposed. |
Artikel |
Veranderend lokaal gezagDe gezagsbronnen van burgemeesters en wethouders verkend |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2013 |
Trefwoorden | authority, political leadership, mayors, aldermen |
Auteurs | Dr. Niels Karsten MSc MA en Drs. Thijs Jansen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The traditional authority of mayors and aldermen is readily challenged. Formal positions do no longer constitute authority. For that reason, new political repertoires are being sought after and are being developed by local political-executive leaders. This article analyses and compares the sources of authority for mayors and aldermen: how can they develop, maintain, and strengthen their authority? It develops an innovative typology of sources of authority. A distinction is made between institutional, positional, and personal sources of authority. The model is applied to the mayors and aldermen in relation to relevant socio-political developments that affect the two offices. It is found that the authority of mayors rests on institutional sources of authority more so than that of aldermen. For the latter, positional and personal sources of authority are more important. At the same time, personal sources of authority have become very important for mayors as well as aldermen. The results call upon mayors and aldermen’s skills and competences to develop personal authority through persuasion. |
Artikel |
Borging van het publiek belang in samenwerkingsverbandenDe rol van intermediairs bij de verlaging van de implementatiekosten van overheidsbeleid |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2013 |
Trefwoorden | public interest,, transaction costs, public private partnership, government information, intermediation |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Frank Den Butter en Sjoerd Ten Wolde MSc S.A. |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
A public interest implies that government intervention is needed in order to enhance societal welfare. After the character of the public interest has been determined from the theoretical perspective of public economics, the government has the responsibility to safeguard the public interest at lowest societal costs. This article discusses the supportive role of intermediaries (or ‘middlemen’), using prescriptions from transaction management. A discussion of three case studies shows how in public private partnerships the knowledge of such intermediaries can be used in order to safeguard the public interest in an efficient manner. |
Artikel |
Groengasprojecten: energietransitie in ruraal Nederland? |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2013 |
Trefwoorden | green gas, Biogas, renewable energy, stakeholder analysis, climate policy |
Auteurs | Drs. Maurits Sanders en Dr. Thomas Hoppe |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
‘Green gas’ is a sustainable alternative to natural gas. It is produced by converting biomass into biogas, which can consequently be upgraded to natural gas standards. Expectations about green gas are high. According to the long term vision of Netbeheer Nederland, the representative association of gas grid operators, green gas will entail 50 percent of the domestic gas mixture by 2050. In line with this vision national government has adopted a green gas innovation support program. Production of green gas takes place in rural areas with abundant supply of organic production resources, especially manure. It is in demonstration projects that green gas niche development is to be proven. In this paper the central question is how green gas demonstration projects manifest at the local level. By conducting a stakeholder analysis, we take a ‘bottom-up’ research approach, which helps us to identify organizational and institutional barriers key local stakeholders have in relation to green gas demonstration projects. We judge this necessary to further understanding in green gas niche development. The results of the analysis are used to advice policymakers about design and use of policy instruments which can help to solve these barriers. |
Artikel |
Burgers als trusteesParticipatie, informele vertegenwoordiging en representativiteit |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2013 |
Auteurs | Dr. Bas van Stokkom, Dr. Marcel Becker en Teun Eikenaar MA MSc |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The involvement of citizens in discussions about policy arrangements has been growing in the past decades. These forums of decision-making often provoke criticism because of a so-called ‘lack of representativeness’. Often a small group of active citizens takes the lead and decides which problems have to be dealt with. Some active residents primarily focus on improving the neighbourhood, regardless of whether their activities have everyone’s consent. This raises many questions related their representativeness. Do these participants form an adequate cross-section of the population? Are they speaking on behalf of others? Maybe passive citizens feel fine with the opinions of active citizens and agree that a small group of citizens is taking the lead. In this paper these active citizens are viewed as ‘trustees’: informal representatives who take responsibility to look after the neighbourhood’s interests, expecting that passive residents would support their efforts. The paper has two central questions: First, which ideas do active participants have about representation and representativeness? Second, in what respects can active citizens be characterized as ‘trustees’? In the theoretical part we contend that the notion ‘trustee’ may function as a theoretical framework to understand present-day citizen participation. In local policy networks many informal representatives express views and interests that are recognizable for many citizens. They are trusted, as long as their activities can be checked. The second part of the paper focuses on three projects of citizen decision-making within local safety policies (The Dutch cities Amsterdam, Deventer and Rotterdam). Within these projects, participants prioritize what kinds of activities and interventions police officers and other frontline workers should carry out. A main finding is that many active citizens function as contact persons who are continuously available for other residents. They do not wish to speak ‘on behalf’ of others but they are bestowed – often reluctantly – with the role of representative, as they demonstratively express neighborhood interests (‘clean, intact and safe’). Their reputation seems to be decisive. |
Artikel |
Ontbrekende alternatieven en gevestigde belangenEen studie naar de posities van overheden in hervormingsdebatten tijdens de financiële crisis |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2012 |
Auteurs | Daniel Mügge PhD en Bart Stellinga MA MSc |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The credit crisis that began in the summer of 2007 has fundamentally challenged much financial regulation and the political institutions that produced it. Measured against the criticisms that have been brought forth against previous financial governance, the extent of governments’ overall reform ambitions has been disappointing. Starting from this observation, this article asks: what explains governments’ reform choices, and thus also their limited ambitions? To explore this question, this article focuses on the positions that four governments central to global financial regulation (the USA, the UK, Germany and France) have taken in advance of the G20 meetings in 2009 across four key issue areas: accounting standards, derivatives trading, credit ratings agencies and banking rules. It evaluates both the overlap between positions across domains and governments as well as the differences between them. Such variation, we argue, provides key clues to the overall drivers behind reforms – as well as their limits. The overall picture that emerges can be summarized as follows: governments have been staunch defenders of their national firms’ competitive interests in regulatory reforms. That has not necessarily meant that they followed industry preferences across the board. It has been the relative impact, compared to foreign competitors, that counted in reform positions, not the absolute impact. These differences of opinion have played out within the context and the limits of the overall debates about thinkable policy alternatives. In spite of fundamental criticisms of pre-crisis regulatory orthodoxy, convincing and coherent alternatives have been forthcoming slowly at best. This has made reform proposals less radical than criticisms, seen on their own, might suggest. |
Artikel |
Laveren tussen belanghebbendenReële autonomie en financieel toezicht |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2012 |
Trefwoorden | regulatory governance, de facto autonomy, financial supervision, bureaucracy, institutional reform |
Auteurs | Dr. Caelesta Braun |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
De facto autonomy, the actual potential of regulatory agencies to go about their daily work, is often conceived to be more important to explain regulatory capacity than its formal autonomy and responsibilities. In this article we investigate whether external context factors, such as the financial and economic crisis have an impact on de facto autonomy. More specifically, we investigate whether the de facto autonomy varies after the crisis and distinctively so for specific subsets of employees within regulatory agencies. According to literature, mid-level managers of agencies are key to de facto autonomy and building a secure reputation for the agency in question. We test these external and internal effects on de facto autonomy with a survey among employees of the Dutch Financial Market Authority (N = 248). The findings show that the perceived influence of stakeholders is relatively constant, but that it is more dynamic for European stakeholders. Both middle managers and employees working at strategic and policy departments of the agency conceive the impact of European stakeholders as increasing in nature. The findings have important implications for our studies of de facto autonomy of regulatory agencies as well as reform potential after major institutional crises. |
Artikel |
It doesn’t always go according to planEen reactie op het Rob-rapport In gesprek of verkeerd verbonden? |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2012 |
Auteurs | Dr. Kristof Jacobs |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors discuss recent research findings that are of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Artikel |
Elite ethiekHoe politici en topambtenaren invulling geven aan publieke waarden |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2012 |
Trefwoorden | public values, government elites, political-administrative relations, elite interviewing, ethics, elites |
Auteurs | Dr. Zeger van der Wal |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This paper reports on a qualitative interview study into the prioritization and interpretation of public values government elites in the Netherlands, comparing value preferences between political and administrative elites. Based on 65 in-depth interviews with MPs, ministers and senior civil servants, statements on four public values (responsiveness, expertise, lawfulness, transparency) that have been deducted through a substantive literature review, are coded and categorized. Overall, political and administrative value preferences in the Netherlands turn out to be more similar than they are different. However, mutual perceptions emphasize differences and contrasts. Theoretical and practical implications of the results are offered and hypotheses are formulated for future studies. |
Artikel |
Politiek en samenleving in het post-Fortuyn tijdperk |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2012 |
Auteurs | Sarah de Lange |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The assassination of Pim Fortuyn and the electoral breakthrough of his Lijst Pim Fortuyn sent shockwaves through the Netherlands in May 2002. This article assesses the influence Fortuyn has had on Dutch politics and society. It provides an overview of the research that has been conducted on this topic over the past decade and relates the findings of previous studies to research on the consequences of the emergence of radical right-wing populist parties on West European party systems. |
Artikel |
Voor en na Fortuyn. Veranderingen en continuïteiten in het burgeroordeel over het democratisch bestuur in Nederland |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2012 |
Trefwoorden | Fortuyn, democratic governance, legitimacy, support, satisfaction |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Frank Hendriks, Dr. Julien van Ostaaijen en Marcel Boogers |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
For several years, Dutch and international survey research programmes, such as the European Values Studies, the Eurobarometer, and the Dutch Parliamentary Elections Studies, have registered the judgements of (Dutch) citizens regarding a wide variety of topics. The Legitimacy-monitor Democratic Governance (Hendriks, Van Ostaaijen & Boogers, 2011) assembles those statistics that together present a layered picture of the legitimacy of democratic governance in the eyes of Dutch citizens. For this article, we review those statistics and take the ‘Fortuyn-year 2002’, the year in which Fortuyn shook up Dutch politics, as a demarcation point. Among the many continuities in pre- and post-Fortuyn statistics, we register a number of marked changes in the judgements of citizens regarding democratic governance in the Netherlands. The most salient, we conclude, is the growing thirst for vigorous ‘leadership’, which not only breaks with the trend of several decades (ever weaker preference for strong leadership), but also the logic of Dutch consensus democracy (many hands and not one head). |
Artikel |
De tucht der wetenschapVeranderingstheorieën van polarisatie- en radicalismebeleid op de proef gesteld |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2012 |
Trefwoorden | polarization, radicalization, evaluation research, theory-driven evaluation, social policy |
Auteurs | Drs. Vasco Lub |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Currently the Dutch government funds dozens of social interventions designed to tackle polarization and radicalization issues. It is still unknown whether the assumptions underlying these interventions are valid. This article puts the theories of change of such interventions to the test. Underlying causal assumptions of four dominant Dutch social policies were confronted with scientific evidence: (1) the system-based approach, (2) peer mediation, (3) intergroup contact and (4) self-esteem enhancement. System-based approaches – comparable to multi-systemic therapy (MST) – seem effective in reducing extremist behaviour in radical youth, but do not necessarily lead to an ideological change. In peer mediation, the causal link between the deployment of young people and the positive outcomes of such methods remains unclear. Peer mediation is also more likely to contribute in conflicts that have not yet escalated. Intergroup contact reduces prejudices about other groups, but has a limited effect. There is also no evidence for a long term effect and positive outcomes of intergroup contact do not automatically apply to adolescents. Finally, it is questionable that enhancing the self-esteem of (moslim) youth makes them more resilient against radical tendencies. In the same vein, the scientific evidence is ambiguous about whether increasing self-esteem results in social desirable behaviour or improved social relations. |
Artikel |
Overlappende waarden, wederzijdse vooroordelenEmpirisch onderzoek naar de mores van politieagenten en particuliere beveiligers |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2012 |
Trefwoorden | policing, security, public-private values, professional motivation |
Auteurs | Dr. Zeger van der Wal, Dr. Ronald van Steden en Dr. Karin Lasthuizen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The private security sector is rapidly growing and their operations more and more comprise policing and public order maintenance, tasks which to date have been government’s primary responsibility. Some fear this development because the private sector is characterized by market values as profitability and efficiency instead of public sector values such as lawfulness and impartiality, putting the quality of public safety at risk. In this article the professional values, norms and motivations of police officers and private security employees in the Netherlands are compared on the basis of a standardized survey. The main conclusion is that there are large differences in how both groups perceive each other, however the underlying professional morale is actually more similar than different. |
Artikel |
Ambtenarij en politie in the picture: De marketing van twee overheidshervormingen |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2004 |
Auteurs | Dave Gelders en Steven Van de Walle |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article examines government communication on two large-scale Belgian governmental reforms: the Federal Administration and the police forces. Using Lees-Marshment's typology of marketing processes, we identify the marketing of the changes by the Federal Administration as sales-oriented: a finished product or an expert-developed administrative reform project to be sold to the public. Declining enthusiasm for communication and growing product disagreement gradually forced this reform to disappear from the market. The police reform followed a market-oriented marketing process. It responded to public outrage. The Government merely reacted to external information. This explains why it failed to deal with a changed market situation. A content analysis of articles in both popular and quality newspapers examines the representation of both reforms in the media and seems to confirm our observations. This article shows that marketing reforms are extremely difficult when there is no shared understanding of the product to be marketed. |
Artikel |
Klassiek en nieuw kloofmanagement |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2004 |
Auteurs | Johan Weggeman |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In managing new cleavages between conflicting values (such as materialism and post-materialism), we cannot simply fall back on a classical approach to cleavage management. The segments surrounding the new cleavage are clearly more fluid than those surrounding the religious or socio-economic cleavages from consociationalism and neo-corporatism, such as is rightly emphasised in the network approach. In the conflict between the materialist and post-materialist value pattern, representation logic is not a given certainty. Not only the facts, but also the negotiating players and the decision-making arenas are the subject of negotiation and strategic action. This is reflected in the new forms of consultation politics. Similarly, consensus formation cannot make do with the (party) political integration of the segments because, given the conditions of post-materialism, this integration can only be partial. It seems important in the new cleavage management to devote attention to the existence of several arenas in which political interests are weighed up. For the players involved in a particular policy issue, this means the lure of strategic forum shopping and thus complication of the conflict-resolving ability of each of the forums. |
Artikel |
Verantwoordelijke vrijheid: responsabilisering van burgers op voorwaarden van de staat |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2011 |
Trefwoorden | governance, responsibilisation, political discourse, politics, public administration |
Auteurs | Rik Peeters en Gerard Drosterij |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Behind many notions of ‘governance’, there lies the image of a ‘modest’ or ‘retreating’ state. The assumption is that local and national authorities can only perform effectively if in cooperation with other public and private actors. Generally, it is said, governments increasingly lack the legitimacy for top-down interventions and hence the need of including participative citizen involvement in policy making and implementation. In recent years this democratic image has been disputed in scientific debates because of its lack of attention for new forms of interventionism by the state in societal processes, e.g. crime, youth care, immigration and integration. In this article, we aim to contribute to this other understanding of modern governance by analysing Dutch political discourse between 2001 and 2010 on (implicit) notions of the role and responsibility of the state. We show how the idea of ‘responsibilisation’ of citizens is turned into an argument for more instead of less state involvement in societal processes and citizens’ lives. By emphasizing ‘shared responsibilities’ between government and society, a tricky picture of parity is sketched of this relation. Dutch government presents itself as ‘an ally’ of citizens in fighting pressing social problems, but in the meantime an ideal of ‘responsible behaviour’ is constructed, namely, citizen behaviour in concordance with government’s policy ambitions. Within this political discourse, the socio-liberal idea of ‘responsibility’ turns into ‘responsibilisation on government’s terms’ and ‘irresponsible’ behaviour becomes a legitimate focal point for deep state interventions through techniques of governance. |
Artikel |
Privaat beheerde woondomeinen: beloftevol of beangstigend fenomeen? |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2011 |
Trefwoorden | housing enclave, gated community, Netherlands, local government |
Auteurs | Jasper Eshuis, Erik-Hans Klijn en Mark van Twist |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In recent years the Netherlands have seen an upsurge of housing enclaves. The enclaves are often built as courtyards, castles, estates or apartment complexes. The growing number of people living in housing enclaves indicates a demand for this kind of living areas. However, the motivations behind the increasing popularity of housing enclaves are unclear. Is this a reflection of a long standing tradition of people staying in their own social group, seeking for belonging and sociability? Or does it fit in a global trend of searching for security in gated communities? This paper presents empirical research in the Netherlands that addresses peoples’ motives for living in housing enclaves, as well as the role of the local government in relation to housing enclaves. The research shows that residents of housing enclaves seek a pleasant living environment in the first place, while security is a less important motive. The study gives reason for planners and developers outside the US not to assume that fear of crime and a wish for security are the main reasons for moving to housing enclaves. Further, the study shows that housing enclaves are not completely privatized areas. Local government still has an important role to play. |
Artikel |
Decentralisatie: maatwerk of uniformiteit?Het Wmo-beleid van Nederlandse gemeenten |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2011 |
Trefwoorden | decentralization, local government, social care |
Auteurs | Judith van der Veer MSc., Jelmer Schalk MSc. en Dr. Rob Gilsing |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
A main motive for policy decentralization is the belief that municipalities are better able to customize public policy to local circumstances, and to realize made-to-measure service provision. In this respect, the introduction of the Social Support Act (Wmo) is an interesting example. With the lack of ‘vertical’ accountability obligations to the national government, the Wmo is governmentally innovative. Whether the decentralization results in customized forms of social support is a fascinating one because a detailed reading of the Wmo and its implementation displays possible incentives as well as barriers to made-to-measure service provision. The empirical exploration in this article uses data from the 2007-2009 evaluation of the Wmo conducted by the Netherlands Institute for Social Research (SCP). The evaluation shows that municipalities involve diverse stakeholders in formulating Wmo policy, and that their involvement seems to lead to customized service provision. At the same time, municipalities follow nationwide models, and information provided by the central government seems to have a major impact on local social care policy. The article concludes with an outlook on future directions in local debates on social care and the recommendation to give time for major decentralization trajectories such as the Wmo. |