In this paper we study both long term and short term individual effects of political participation at the local level. Participatory theorists argue that political participation could lead to individual emancipation in terms of a rise of political knowledge and, in the long term, political trust. Indeed, in the short term the increased political knowledge associated with participation might enable citizens to better define their self-interest, which may be inconsistent with actual policies pursued by the local authorities and thus might be conductive to distrust. In the empirical part we will test these assertions using two-wave panel data for a random sample of 457 individuals in the district of Deurne (Antwerp – Belgium). Our results suggest that in the short term participation leads to more local political knowledge and distrust in the local administration. However, we do not find a significant increase in political trust in the long term. |
Article |
Politieke participatie: Wat doet dat met een mens?Een panelstudie van Belgische lokale data |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 2 2012 |
Trefwoorden | political participation, political knowledge, political trust, emancipation process, local politics |
Auteurs | Peter Thijssen en Didier Dierckx |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Article |
De impact van multi-level governance op de democratische input in het EU-handelsbeleid onder het Verdrag van Lissabon |
Tijdschrift | Res Publica, Aflevering 1 2012 |
Trefwoorden | multi-level governance, subsidiarity, EU trade policy, legitimacy, participation |
Auteurs | Fabienne Bossuyt |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article examines the impact of multi-level governance (MLG) on the democratic input into European Union (EU) trade policy under the Lisbon Treaty. Focusing on two recently concluded EU trade agreements, i.e. the multi-party agreement with Colombia and Peru and the association agreement with Central America, the article traces several dangers and risks that MLG entails for democratic accountability and participation, which are closely tied to the strong output-oriented nature of MLG and its emphasis on technical effi ciency. These dangers of MLG – the article argues – are not accidental, but are fi rmly rooted within an underlying hegemonic social-economic trend, characterised by an intentional (neo-liberal dominated) attempt to de-politise, and even de-democratise, European political policy-making. |