In this article we discuss the role and position of different types of low income households in Dutch renewable energy transition processes using the concept of energy poverty. We explore which benefits and/or (dis)advantages (unintentionally) result from energy policies and regulations. And to what extent the distribution of these (dis)advantages benefit the position of different types of households. To this end we present an analytical perspective that enables us to evaluate renewable energy transition policies and governance on procedural and distributional aspects: paying attention to issues of recognition, equity and justice. The perspective draws on ideas in environmental justice literature and on ideas in social resilience literature. Combining these ideas in a new analytical framework proved to be useful in articulating some major policy challenges in relation to energy poverty in the Netherlands today. |
Zoekresultaat: 82 artikelen
Dissertatie |
The governance of self-organizationAnalyzing the governance relationship between municipalities and community-based collectives |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Auteurs | José Nederhand |
Artikel |
De energietransitie: wie kunnen, willen en mogen er meedoen? |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | renewable energy policies, energy poverty, environmental justice, social resilience |
Auteurs | Dr. Sylvia Breukers, Dr. Susanne Agterbosch en Dr. Ruth Mourik |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Thema-artikel |
De Frankfurter Schule en algoritmisch bestuur |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | algorithmic governance, enlightenment, Frankfurter Schule, public administration, technology critique |
Auteurs | Dr. Ringo Ossewaarde |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Frankfurter Schule offers an interesting intellectual orientation for critical public administration that seeks to unmask problematic political-administrative power structures. It compels public administration scholars to reflect on the policy processes and bureaucratic structures of a technological society, and the legitimizing or criticizing role of public administration scholars in this. A critical public administration that is inspired by the Frankfurter Schule does not accept existing processes and structures. On the contrary, it contests them and uncovers them as a critique of domination, repression, reification, one-dimensionality, bias, erotic deficit and lack of creativity. It is focussed on identifying alternative, more humanizing and democratizing, futures. In this essay the significance of the Frankfurter Schule for critical public administration in technological society is explored. The development of algorithmic governance serves as a case to illustrate critical analysis, to reveal the essence of the Frankfurter Schule, and to show some of its contemporary relevance for critical public administration. Algorithmic governance is portrayed as a type of governance that reinforces existing policy processes and bureaucratic structures of technological society, and is unmasked by critical public administration scholars as a force of reification. |
Reflectie & debat |
Voorbij het stigma van de populistische demonstrant: protest heeft een centrale functie in onze democratie! |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Auteurs | Dr. Nanke Verloo |
Auteursinformatie |
Redactioneel |
Bestuurswetenschappen: wisseling van de wacht |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Nico Nelissen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this editorial the former chief-editor Bas Denters and the new chief-editor Marcel Boogers of this magazine ‘Bestuurswetenschappen’ (the Dutch word for Administrative Sciences) are interviewed on the occasion of changing the guard. This change is a good opportunity to highlight the views of both prominent figures on developments in public administration, in local and regional government, as well as on the role and significance of our magazine. With its new chief-editor, it is entering a new period. The third decade of the new millennium will prove to be just as unsettled, and possibly even more turbulent, as the previous period. Social developments are unfolding rapidly. Public Administration must provide answers to these developments, but also act as a guide. Not from an inapproachable seat, but from a position that puts local and regional government in the midst of citizens and private initiatives. |
Vrij artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 4 2019 |
Trefwoorden | citizen participation, democratic legitimacy, street-level interactions, informal citizenship, contestation |
Auteurs | Dr. Nanke Verloo |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The goal of citizens participation increases the moments of contact between politicians, policy makers, welfare professionals and citizens. The shared responsibility for local decision making is not an easy task. Often conflicts emerge between parties with opposing needs and interests. Citizens oppose decisions or organize protest. These moments do not only challenge the goal of participation, they also jeopardize the quality of democracy. The democratic value of contentious moments, however, is often neglected. How can public professionals deal with the dilemma’s and chances that emerge during interactions that happen unexpectedly at the street-level? I answer that question by applying the agonistic approach to democracy to the action repertoire of public professionals dealing with conflict. A dramaturgical analysis of contentious interactions provides insights in how we can recognize and acknowledge contentious citizenship. |
Artikel |
Over Rousseau, goede burgers en de participatiesamenlevingEen normatieve analyse van het nieuwe contractdenken van de Nederlandse overheid door de ogen van een klassieke contractdenker |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2019 |
Trefwoorden | Beleidsevaluatie, Burgerschap, Participatiesamenleving, Rousseau, Sociaal contract |
Auteurs | Dr. Yvonne Kleistra |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In the Netherlands good citizenship has become a topic of increased importance on the government agenda since the murder of Pim Fortuyn. The author assesses the effectiveness of the Dutch citizenship policies within the context of the broader policy framework of the so-called participatory society (participatiesamenleving) or do-democracy (doe-democratie). The evaluative analysis consists of two parts. In the first part the changing ideas concerning good citizenship are identified as well as the normative assumptions that are at the basis of Dutch citizenship policies. In the second part, the potential of current policies, and in particular the ideas that gave rise to creating a new social contract between government and society are assessed. To this end some key aspects of the new contract thinking of the Dutch government are contrasted with the ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. The findings show that the current strive for tangible agreements on citizen behavior and civic duties is at odds with the main principles of classic contract theory. This leads to the conclusion that the new contractualism that is at the basis of the Dutch citizen policies should rather be seen as a threat to a stable society than as a building block for good citizenship. |
Vrij artikel |
Burgerparticipatie: ontwikkelingstypen van bewonersverbandenInteractie tussen participatieprofessionals en bewonersverbanden in beeld |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 3 2019 |
Trefwoorden | citizen participation, self-organisation, public participation professionals, community enterprises, Amsterdam |
Auteurs | Dr. ir. Anna de Zeeuw, Eelco van Wijk MSc en Dr. Alex Straathof |
Samenvatting |
Local authorities expect citizens to fulfil an increasing number of public services. In that context, citizen-based networks are emerging as means to fulfil a variety of public tasks, varying from supporting young entrepreneurs and strengthening social cohesion, to providing local care. In this article, we address the following questions: Which phases do community enterprises pass through in their efforts towards realising a sustainable contribution and how do participation professionals support these phases? To respond to this question, researchers followed seven community enterprises based in Amsterdam over a two-year period. We identified a typology of four development phases, with particular attention to the interaction between external participation professionals and the key persons of community enterprises. The study has practical relevance for governance of citizen participation and also raises important follow-up questions about the role of the local government. |
Thema |
|
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 3 2019 |
Auteurs | Dr. Niels Karsten en Dr. Sabine van Zuydam |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
At the time of the ‘dualization’ of Dutch local government in 2002 the acting municipal chairman of the local council under article 77 (1) of the Dutch Municipal Act was seen as the ‘guardian of the local council’, who has a special responsibility for the functioning of the council as a whole and who can give the council a face opposite the local board. However, this role has never been given to this ‘vice-president’. This option has recently been suggested again, with the aim of promoting cooperation within the local council and facilitating the changing role of the council. In this article, the authors show that the role of the vice-president in practice is limited, although importance is attached to it and a majority of municipal councils use the power to appoint their own vice-president. For the time being the Netherlands does not seem inclined to learn from Flanders, where the council now appoints its own chairman. This is partly due to differences between the mayor’s positions in the Netherlands and in Flanders. At the same time, it cannot be ruled out that in the Netherlands too in the future more attention will be paid to the issue of the (vice-)presidency of the municipal council. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2019 |
Trefwoorden | Gentrification, Bridging capital, Bonding capital, Amsterdam North, Public familiarity |
Auteurs | Dr. Linda van de Kamp en Dr. Saskia Welschen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
We analyze how ‘original’ residents in different gentrifying working class areas in Amsterdam North experience and evaluate the changes in their neighborhood in terms of social cohesion – in other words, whether they feel at home in their changing neighborhood and whether they feel connected to other residents. Policy interventions often focus on establishing connections between residents with different socioeconomic or cultural backgrounds, in order to stimulate mutual understanding. An underlying policy aim is to uplift vulnerable original residents through contact with higher income groups. Based on our empirical data, we critically assess the concept of ‘bridging capital’ (Putnam, 2000) that underpins several of the social activities that are organized in areas such as the ones in our study. Subsequently, we discuss the importance of ‘bonding capital’ or the sense of interconnectedness and strong ties amongst original residents. Our empirical data – based on both interviews and participatory observation – suggest that activities within the ‘own’ community contribute importantly to feelings of belonging in the neighborhood. In the final section of the article, we discuss how different types of local meeting places offer opportunities for ‘lighter’ forms of interactions without aiming directly at strong connections between differently positioned neighborhood residents. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2019 |
Auteurs | Dr. Cody Hochstenbach en Dr. Nanke Verloo |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Access to affordable, decent and secure housing is under increasing pressure in countries across the world, especially in burgeoning cities. This results in displacement, exclusion and increasing housing cost burdens. This theme issue consists of a collection of papers that approach inequality on urban housing markets from different angles. In this introduction to the special issue, we provide a framework to understand these various dimensions of inequality and their interconnectedness. We identify three scales of inequality: First, at the abstract level of housing systems, market developments and housing policies contribute to increasing housing costs and a reduction in affordable housing units. Second, at the urban level we identify increasing spatial segregation between populations as well as the intertwined trends of intensifying gentrification and suburbanization of poverty. Third, at the everyday level we can identify a loss of belonging among long-term residents of changing (gentrifying) neighbourhoods, while other residents may appreciate change. This also fosters the potential for conflict and poses new challenges to professionals dealing with families in situations of poverty. We argue that emerging inequalities at these different scales need to be considered as interconnected. |
Boekensignalement |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2019 |
Auteurs | Dr. Mark van Ostaijen |
Samenvatting |
In this feature authors review recently published books on subjects of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2019 |
Trefwoorden | Residualisering, Stedelijk sociaal werk, Concentratie van sociale problematiek, Link work, Geuzenveld |
Auteurs | Dr. Saskia Welschen en Dr. Lex Veldboer |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The impact of residualisation on social work has so far hardly been explored. Based on existing literature and recently started empirical research in Amsterdam we analyze several consequences. Residualisation refers to the process whereby urban social housing is strictly allocated to the lowest income groups. What does this concentration of disadvantaged households mean for the role of social workers? Firstly, for community workers residualisation mostly implies a renewed role as instigators of residents’ participation in urban renewal trajectories for social mix. Furthermore community activities are increasingly used to offer safe havens for new and old groups of residents and also to prevent expensive treatments for several residential groups. For social workers focusing on individual support or casework residualisation results in an increasingly complex caseload. Residualisation does not imply extra formation for social work, but rather extra attention for the effortful coproduction of welfare between formal and informal actors. Within this playing field, we distinguish link work as vital for both formal and informal social work. Link work is about establishing vertical and horizontal connections between different worlds, across sectoral, professional or trust gaps. We expect that in areas of residualisation successful urban social work is dependent on strong linking skills. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2019 |
Trefwoorden | Neoliberalism, The Netherlands, Intellectual history, Political history, Essentially contested concepts |
Auteurs | Dr. Merijn Oudenampsen en Dr. Bram Mellink |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The word neoliberalism has often been the object of fierce controversy in the Dutch public debate. Prominent intellectuals have equated neoliberalism with extremism and fundamentalism, with some going as far as calling it a ‘totalitarian faith’. The opposite camp in the debate has argued that neoliberalism is largely a self-invented bogeyman of the left, a swearword used by critics to engage in an intellectual witch-hunt. Of course, neoliberalism is not the only social science term suffering from a polemical status. Common concepts such as populism, socialism, nationalism or conservatism have given rise to similar lasting disagreements and comparable accusations of their derogatory use. What does appear to be exceptional about neoliberalism in the Dutch debate, is that very few conceptual and historical studies have been published on the subject. While the word neoliberalism is commonly employed in Dutch mainstream social science, many scholars seem to use the term without much further qualification. This paper explores the controversy and looks for ways to proceed beyond it. Drawing on a recent wave of international scholarship, it outlines an ideational approach to neoliberalism. After tracing the origins of the term neoliberalism, it closes with a preliminary example of an ideational analysis of Dutch neoliberalism. |
Thema-artikel ‘Uitgesproken Bestuurskunde’ |
|
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 2 2019 |
Auteurs | Dr. Haiko van der Voort en Dr. Philip Marcel Karré |
Thema-artikel ‘Uitgesproken Bestuurskunde’ |
Van wie is de verzorgingsstaat?Bestuurskunde als zelfbestuurskunde |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 2 2019 |
Trefwoorden | institutional analysis, common-pool resources, welfare state, self-governance |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Menno Fenger |
Samenvatting |
The work of Elinor Ostrom suggests that under certain conditions local communities are better able to sustainably manage so-called common pool resources than an external party such as government. In this article I explore whether and to what extent those conditions also apply to the governance of the Dutch welfare state. I show that in the current participation society there are numerous examples in which self-governance seems to be successful and in which Ostrom’s conditions seem to play an important role. On that basis, I come to the conclusion that citizens – under certain institutional conditions – may be better able to resolve social problems among themselves than through external interventions. This requires a shift from public administration to self-administration. |
Thema |
|
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 2 2019 |
Auteurs | Dr. Els van der Pool en Dr. Guido Rijnja |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Governance is a human activity and is therefore unquestionably about relationships. Relationships between public and private parties. Relationships in existing steering-oriented structures (the political administrator as guardian, magistrate) and also relationships in new forms of cooperation that are often focused on good relationships (government participation). Public-private partnerships are inevitably accompanied by conflicting interests that place different demands on interactions. One-size-fits-all does not fit there, but customization is required, with constant alignment with what is – and what is not (yet). And so the ability to make contact requires much more attention, and from there to explore and grasp perspectives. How do you work on the tensions that you find on your way? It is there that the method of communication influences how the process of cooperation and steering proceeds. This is not a matter of whether-or, but and-and. Both perspectives are characterized by a different relationship with those involved and a different way of contact and interaction. This article focuses on contact from a collaborative perspective. The classical administrative side already has a rich history, while the cooperation side is often still an unknown and unexplored territory. The central question is: how can you, as a director and public professional, deliver tailor-made solutions and therefore adapt to complex tasks? The authors look at complex situations from a communicative perspective and they introduce ‘appreciative communication’ as the art of aligning with what really moves people, as a frame of view of the inconvenience caused by the differences present. They highlight a number of generic tensions that can arise in cooperation situations. A case study into the approach to regional innovation in the field of mobility serves as an illustration. |
Artikel |
Het asielzoekerscentrum als buurthuis? Over vrijwilligerswerk in asielzoekerscentra in Amsterdam en Brussel |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2019 |
Trefwoorden | Asylum centres, Community centres, Refugees, Civic engagement, Interpretive policy analyses |
Auteurs | Rosaly Studulski en Nanke Verloo |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Citizens are being activated to organize activities in asylum centres in both the Netherlands and Belgium. That way, asylum centres are expected to become better integrated in the local context of a municipality or neighbourhood. This ideal of citizenship does not stand on its own. The policy object to integrate asylum centres in the local context has parallels with broader societal and academic discussions about citizen participation and active citizenship. The object, however, is now the asylum seeker. In this article we research how voluntary work in two asylum centres takes shape and how policy could support voluntary activities better. A comparative interpretive policy analysis of two asylum centres in Amsterdam and Brussel shows how voluntary work is stimulated by policy, how these policies are implemented locally, and how they are experienced in daily practices of volunteers and professionals. The cases reveal stark differences, but exactly those contrasts lead to important lessons. We show that because of this policy, the asylum centre is often functioning as a community centre, that integration can be strengthened by volunteers, but we are also critical when voluntary activities are driven by an ideal picture of the ‘good asylum seeker’. There is a risk that the societal responsibility for integrating and engaging asylum seekers in the local context is pushed on the shoulders of unpaid volunteers and that activities are exclusively for one group. That is why we conclude that professional support and financial resources are crucial to implement the policy ideal of active citizenship in asylum centers. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleidsonderzoek Online, januari 2019 |
Auteurs | Willem Bokkes |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Gemeenten ondersteunen, onder andere met subsidies, maatschappelijke initiatieven. Met die subsidies zijn landelijk miljoenen euro’s gemoeid. De maatschappelijke effecten van initiatieven worden niet of slechts globaal onderzocht. Een van de argumenten om dit te rechtvaardigen luidt: als er genoeg draagvlak in een wijk of dorp is, moet een initiatief wel maatschappelijke meerwaarde hebben. |
Artikel |
Diversiteit in bestuurskundig perspectief |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 4 2018 |
Trefwoorden | diversity perspectives, interventions, public sector, business case, binding |
Auteurs | Dr. Saniye Çelik |
Samenvatting |
In practice, diversity interventions do not always appear to be effective. One argument is that there is little or no match between the perspectives of public organizations on diversity and the interventions used. This article provides an overview of the underlying rationales for diversity policy and discusses the perspectives on diversity from the diversity literature, HRM, and management literature and how these overlap, complement each other and differ from each other. What these perspectives have in common is that they all emphasize the added value of diversity. In the diversity literature, the emphasis is on the four perspectives equality, legitimacy, creativity, and the labour market. HRM literature focusses on managing differences. In public administration, there is a shift from active representation by individuals to connecting by all employees. Furthermore, the binding perspective is gaining more and more importance in the public domain because it may be possible to close the gap between the government and its citizen. This perspective emphasizes the importance of the long-term relationship with citizens to strengthen the trust of citizens in the government for realizing social tasks and responsibilities. It makes diversity an issue for all employees. For Hassan and Havva, and also for Hans and Hanna. |