Exactly a hundred years ago Jos van der Grinten wrote an article in De Beiaard (a catholic magazine) with which he established his name as early administrative scientist. In this respect he is an important ally of Gerrit van Poelje, who is generally recognized to be the founder of the (local) administrative sciences in the Netherlands. This essay discusses the most important themes in the work of Van der Grinten against the background of the early debate about the quality of local administration in the Netherlands. The essay also looks into his place in the history of (local) administrative sciences, not only nationally in relation to Gerrit van Poelje, but also internationally in relation to the American writer Frank Goodnow. In 1923 Van der Grinten (until his early death in 1932) was the first professor of State and Administrative Law at the new Catholic University of Nijmegen. As the city secretary of Nijmegen he played an important role at the arrival of this university to Nijmegen, but in this period he also contributed to the (local) administrative sciences. In this sense he is the forerunner of Public Administration, first at the Legal Department and later at the Social Department of the Radboud University in Nijmegen. |
Zoekresultaat: 7 artikelen
Discussie |
De vroege geschiedenis van de (lokale) bestuurswetenschappenJos van der Grinten als bondgenoot van Gerrit van Poelje |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 1 2018 |
Auteurs | Rik Reussing |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
De erfenis van beleid: de crisis en hervorming van het Nederlandse volkshuisvestingsbeleid |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2004 |
Auteurs | Jan-Kees Helderman en Taco Brandsen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Dutch housing policy has been reformed dramatically over the last fifteen years. The reforms were preceded by an equally dramatic policy crisis during the 1970s and 1980s. This article attempts to explain the development of both the crisis and the subsequent reforms. An important explanatory variable is the logic of provision, relating to the fact that housing comes in the shape of stock and capital. However, the institutional logic of Dutch housing policy, notably the fact that most social housing providers are traditionally private nonprofits, has also proved of vital significance in determining the outcome of the reform process. Distinguishing the effects of the logic of provision and the institutional logic enables an analysis of how policy feedback, the inheritance from previous policies, may cause both policy crisis and policy reform. |
Artikel |
Zorgmarkten en publieke belangen |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2010 |
Auteurs | Teun Zuiderent-Jerak, Kor Grit en Tom van der Grinten |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Gezondheidszorg: een stelsel van stelsels |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2004 |
Auteurs | Tom van der Grinten, Jan-Kees Helderman en Kim Putters |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
There is probably no other sector of the welfare state where the gap between citizen's expectations and government's opportunities is deepening so intensely and has such a complex and politicized reform agenda as the health care sector. Health care is a critical case par excellence to study the relation between efficiency and legitimization of welfare state reform. The leading question of this special issue of Beleid & Maatschappij is: how does the Dutch health care system and the connected public policymaking accommodate the different and often conflicting goals (input), organizing concepts (throughput) and outcomes (output)? With these questions in mind the dominant governance principles of Dutch health care, especially the system of regulated competition, are scrutinized. One of the findings is, that 'second best' solutions are the highest achievable in this field, a notion that reform policies should take into account. |
Artikel |
Stelsel-matig hervormen |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2004 |
Auteurs | Kim Putters, Jan-Kees Helderman en Tom van der Grinten |
Samenvatting |
There is probably no other sector of the welfare state where the gap between citizen's expectations and government's opportunities is deepening so intensely and has such a complex and politicized reform agenda as the health care sector. Health care is a critical case par excellence to study the relation between efficiency and legitimization of welfare state reform. The leading question of this special issue of Beleid & Maatschappij is: how does the Dutch health care system and the connected public policymaking accommodate the different and often conflicting goals (input), organizing concepts (throughput) and outcomes (output)? With these questions in mind the dominant governance principles of Dutch health care, especially the system of regulated competition, are scrutinized. One of the findings is, that 'second best' solutions are the highest achievable in this field, a notion that reform policies should take into account. |
Artikel |
Nieuwe bestuurlijke verhoudingen in de gezondheidszorg en de rol van de overheid |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 2 2006 |
Auteurs | Kim Putters en Tom van der Grinten |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
De rollen verdeeld: Het veranderende speelveld in de zorg |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 2 2006 |
Auteurs | Tom van der Grinten en Kim Putters |
Auteursinformatie |