From 1964 (until around 1990), political science became the dominant approach within (local) administrative sciences in the Netherlands. This position was taken over from the legal approach. In this period, the concepts of politics, policy and decision-making were central to research and theory. In the period up to 1990, we still see a predominantly administration-centric or government-centric perspective among these political scientists, although we already see incentives from different authors for a broader perspective (the politics, policy and decision-making concepts remain relevant however) that will continue in the period thereafter. This broader perspective (on institutions, management and governance) took shape in the period after 1990, in which Public Administration would increasingly profile itself as an independent (inter)discipline. This essay tells the story of the (local) administrative sciences in this period as envisaged by twelve high-profile professors. The story starts in 1990 in Leiden with the (gradual) transition from classical to institutional Public administration, as is revealed in the inaugural lecture by Theo Toonen. This is followed by eleven other administrative scientists, who are divided into four ‘generations’ of three professors for convenience. In conclusion, the author of this essay argues that there is mainly a need for what he calls a (self-)critical Public Administration. |
Zoekresultaat: 88 artikelen
Essay |
Geschiedenis van de (lokale) bestuurswetenschappen: instituties, management en governance |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 1 2021 |
Auteurs | Rik Reussing |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Diversen |
Bestuurskunde en de coronacrisis (2) |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Boekbespreking |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleidsonderzoek Online, oktober 2020 |
Auteurs | Peter van Hoesel |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Het boek van voormalig topambtenaar Roel Bekker Dat had niet zo gemoeten! analyseert op scherpe wijze fouten en falen bij de overheid. Doordat de overheid allerlei steken laat vallen bij de voorbereiding van beleid en bovendien te weinig leert van beleidsevaluaties, ontstaat er beleid dat verre van optimaal functioneert, onder meer omdat de uitvoering wordt belast met (zeer) ingewikkelde procedures. Voor de overheid valt uit dit boek veel te leren over hoe het beter kan worden aangepakt. De vraag is wel of dat ook gaat gebeuren, want eerdere publicaties met waardevolle aanbevelingen op dit gebied hebben maar weinig effect gehad. |
Titel |
Internationale tijdschriften en boeken |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Auteurs | Dr. Rik Reussing |
Auteursinformatie |
Thema-artikel |
Het gezag van gemeentesecretarissen beschouwd |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | authority, municipal secretary, local governance, sources of authority, leadership |
Auteurs | Corné van der Meulen MSc, Drs. Thijs Jansen en Drs. Niels Karsten |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The authority of a municipal secretary has to be continuously earned. This is a complex task that demands highly developed personal qualities and attributes. According to an opinion poll, filled out by 120 active municipal secretaries, they believe that they meet these necessary standards. In this poll they were asked what they recognize as their most important sources of authority. The top three answers were, respectively; personal leadership, trust, embodied ethics. Other important factors were their roles as chief executive officer of local governance and/or first advisor. These roles are however no longer enough to establish authority within local governance. Authority and influence must be earned on a daily basis in vastly different spheres and among different social groups. |
Diversen |
Mededelingen van de redactie |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Lokaal internationaal |
Internationale tijdschriften en boeken |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Auteurs | Dr. Rik Reussing |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleidsonderzoek Online, juni 2020 |
Auteurs | Pieter Raymaekers en Marleen Brans |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Theorieën en methoden uit de gedragswetenschappen betreden steeds nadrukkelijker de beleidsscene. Gedragsinzichten en nudging beloven beleid te verrijken en te versterken. Het begin van deze gedragswetenschappelijke omslag of behavioural turn laat men doorgaans samenvallen met de publicatie van het boek Nudge van Richard Thaler en Cass Sunstein in 2008. In dit artikel plaatsen we nudging in perspectief en argumenteren we dat het concept zowel een zegen als een vloek betekent, en zowel een katalysator als een rem is voor de bredere toepassing en verankering van gedragsinzichten in beleid. Ondanks het aantrekkelijke narratief botst nudging op functionele limieten en ethische bezwaren. Om de gedragswetenschappelijke, experimentele en evidence-based beleidsbeloften alsnog in te lossen, zien we een strategie van steeds verdere verbreding. Het programma van de Behavioural Insights-beweging op basis van vijf pijlers leek in eerste instantie een oplossing te bieden, maar kampt door een eendimensionale interpretatie met interne spanningen. De nog bredere en ambitieuzere Behavioural Public Policy-agenda biedt nieuwe perspectieven, maar moet op functioneel en ethisch vlak nog verder onderbouwd worden. |
Essay |
Geschiedenis van de (lokale) bestuurswetenschappen: politicologie, beleidswetenschap en public choice |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Auteurs | Dr. Rik Reussing |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
From 1964 until roughly 1990, political science would become the dominant approach within the (local) administrative sciences in the Netherlands. This central position was taken over from the legal approach. Important impulses from political science for Public Administration came only from the second-generation political scientists: Gijs Kuypers at the Free University Amsterdam, Hans Daudt at the University of Amsterdam and Hans Daalder at the University of Leiden. In their footsteps, a political scientist emerged who, through his contribution to several universities (the Free University, the University of Nijmegen and the University of Twente), had a great deal of influence on the further development of Dutch Public Administration: Andries Hoogerwerf. Two other approaches emerged from political science that were important for the development of modern public administration in the Netherlands, namely policy science and the new political economy (public choice). In this essay the author outlines the input of the main figures from political science, policy science and public choice until 1990 in various stages that are most relevant to Public Administration. These stages take us to various cities and universities in the Netherlands. In addition, we see important cross-fertilization between the institutions through the transfer of people from one university to another. After 1990 however, Public Administration would increasingly profile itself as an independent inter-discipline. |
Wel beschouwd |
Brico-leren |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 4 2019 |
Auteurs | Dr. Rogier van der Wal |
Auteursinformatie |
Reflectie & debat |
Is het Antropoceen bestuurbaar?Pragmatische aantekeningen bij een nieuw tijdperk |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2019 |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Hans Boutellier |
Auteursinformatie |
Thema-artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 3 2019 |
Trefwoorden | Positive Public Administration, successful public governance, research agenda, societal relevance |
Auteurs | Scott Douglas DPhil, Prof. dr. Trui Steen en Prof. dr. Zeger van der Wal |
Samenvatting |
Citizens and scholars excel in identifying and analysing government failure. It is important indeed to understand public sector, but while governments in the Low Countries are doing well on average and very well from an internationally perspective, most attention is focused on the errors and mishaps. This article argues for a robust positive perspective on the public sector as a complement to existing research. From a scientific perspective, public administration must set itself the ambition to connect and aggregate existing positive insights even better. From a social perspective, the discipline must prevent the gap from being filled by a wholesale rejection of democratic government or the use of unproven miracle cures. This article elaborates the starting points for Positive Public Administration, arguing that this perspective should be comprehensive, context related, inter-subjective, learning-oriented, and robustly scientific in nature. The article also introduces the other contributions in this special issue, which together give an initial interpretation of positive public administration. |
Thema-artikel |
Positieve beleidsevaluatie: hoe evaluatieonderzoek kan bijdragen aan beter beleid |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 3 2019 |
Trefwoorden | positive public administration, positive evaluation, positive psychology, success, policy oriented learning |
Auteurs | Dr. Peter van der Knaap en Dr. Rudi Turksema |
Samenvatting |
New insights from the field of positive psychology led to the insight that people learn more effectively from positive feedback. Policy evaluation aims to improve public policy programmes through contributing to both accountability and learning. This ambiguous ambition has contributed to a considerable body of research into the impact of policy evaluation. Too often the conclusion is that the outcomes of policy evaluations – which are often negative by nature – are sparsely used by policy makers. This has led to series of improvements in the way we carry out evaluations. First through technical improvements and then by more responsive approaches. Both have not led to the desired breakthrough. Building on a number of positive evaluation studies, we advance a more positive approach in policy evaluation. Focussing on the successes in policy programmes rather than on its failures may contribute to evaluation impact. Consequently, we think a more positive, appreciative approach and using data to find success in policy making is necessary for policy evaluators to be more effective. This article presents practical examples of positive policy evaluations and successful use of data in the domain of policy evaluation. |
Thema-artikel |
Wanneer worden gemeenten gezien als waardevol?Lokale publieke waardecreatie door de ogen van lokale actoren |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 3 2019 |
Trefwoorden | public value management, Positive Public Administration, local government, performance assessment |
Auteurs | Scott Douglas DPhil en Prof. dr. Paul ’t Hart |
Samenvatting |
This article explores how we can gain insight into the quality of local government with the help of the public value perspective. The public value perspective does not evaluate government through generalised standards or benchmarks, but through the judgments of the actors involved in the policy. This approach could do better justice to the unique context of different governments, such as different local governments. The public value perspective, however, is hampered by the competing expectations that actors have of public policy and their generally negative bias towards the government. Based on 71 interviews with local actors in six municipalities, we show how the public value approach does indeed yields many different and critical perspectives, even within municipalities that are considered successful by national experts. However, we also show which connections exist between these seemingly competing perspectives and how sombre judgments about past governance are actually influenced by optimistic ambitions for the future. |
Reflectie & debat |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2019 |
Auteurs | Richard Kofi en Annemarie de Wildt |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Reflection and debate initiates academically inspired discussions on issues that are on the current policy agenda. |
Thema-artikel ‘Uitgesproken Bestuurskunde’ |
Balanceren en experimenterenWetenschap en praktijk van publiek management |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 2 2019 |
Trefwoorden | bureaucracy, competing values, leadership, public managers, practice |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Sandra Groeneveld |
Samenvatting |
Increasing demands and competing values force public organizations to introduce new organizational forms that veer away from rigid bureaucratic structures while remaining in control. How do public managers and their employees deal with the dilemmas that these decentralized and organic ways of organizing entail? On the one hand it must be prevented that public managers fall back too quickly on structures that rely on control and formalization, while, on the other hand, they themselves as managers are still primarily held accountable based on those bureaucratic principles. New organizational forms also assume that leadership is shared and distributed. This not only asks for a higher degree of self-management of employees, but also requires from formal leaders that such behavior is supported and encouraged. In our research and teaching on these changes in public organizations, we work closely with practice. That too is a matter of balancing, this time of public engagement with scientific independence. |
Thema-artikel ‘Uitgesproken Bestuurskunde’ |
Bestuurswetenschap in de kennissamenlevingEen pleidooi voor een transdisciplinaire en veelvormige wetenschapsbenadering |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 2 2019 |
Trefwoorden | research program, knowledge society, transdisciplinarity, plural approach, technology |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Albert Meijer |
Samenvatting |
This article presents the research program into governance in a knowledge society of professor Albert Meijer and colleagues at Utrecht University. The knowledge society is a society in which (1) citizens are higher educated that ever before and their level of education largely determines their societal position, (2) knowledge plays a key role in administrative and policy processes and is increasingly contested and (3) technology plays a key role in every facet of societal life. Research into governance of and in the knowledge society requires a transdisciplinary and plural approach to scientific work. Transdisciplinarity entails combining insights from science with various forms of contextual and practical knowledge. A plural approach to scientific works means that we should not only do explanatory empirical work but also theoretical, normative and prescriptive research. The overall ambition of this research program is to contribute to a democratic debate about the governance of the future. |
Lokaal internationaal |
Internationale tijdschriften en boeken |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 2 2019 |
Auteurs | Dr. Rik Reussing |
Auteursinformatie |
Article |
Consensus Democracy and Bureaucracy in the Low Countries |
Tijdschrift | Politics of the Low Countries, Aflevering 1 2019 |
Trefwoorden | consensus democracy, bureaucracy, governance system, Lijphart, policymaking |
Auteurs | Frits van der Meer, Caspar van den Berg, Charlotte van Dijck e.a. |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Taking Lijphart’s work on consensus democracies as our point of departure, we signal a major shortcoming in Lijphart’s focus being almost exclusively on the political hardware of the state structure, leaving little attention for the administrative and bureaucratic characteristics of governance systems. We propose to expand the Lijphart’s model which overviews structural aspects of the executive and the state with seven additional features of the bureaucratic system. We argue that these features are critical for understanding the processes of policymaking and service delivery. Next, in order to better understand the functioning of the Netherlands and Belgium as consensus democracies, we provide a short analysis of the historical context and current characteristics of the political-administrative systems in both countries. |
Essay |
Geschiedenis van de (lokale) bestuurswetenschappen: sociografie, sociologie en bestuurskunde |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 1 2019 |
Auteurs | Dr. Rik Reussing |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
A large number of people, institutions, journals and approaches have contributed to the history of (local) administrative sciences in the Netherlands. Initially (around 1914) the legal approach was dominant; from 1964 onwards, political science would become the dominant approach; and from 1990 onwards, Public Administration would increasingly profile itself as an independent discipline. This essay concentrates on the influence on this development of sociology and its, typically Dutch, predecessor sociography. The starting point here is the promotion tree of the founder of the Dutch sociology Sebald Steinmetz. Through him various lines (via his doctorates Nicolaas ter Veen and Jakob Kruijt) go to modern Public Administration. This essay tells the story of the influence of sociography and sociology on the development of the administrative sciences and modern Public Administration in six acts, in which two persons from the promotion tree are discussed (via Sjoerd Groenman, who is promoted by Nicolaas ter Veen there are two different lines again). The line via Jakob Kruijt contains Aris van Braam (he wrote in 1957 what is considered the first Dutch empirical study in Public Administration) and Jos Raadschelders. The first line via Sjoerd Groenman contains Henk Brasz (the first full-time professor in Public Administration in the Netherlands), Fred Fleurke and Ko de Ridder. The second line via Sjoerd Groenman contains Joop Ellemers, Geert Braam (professor at the first regular Dutch Public Administration programme in Twente) and Wim Derksen. These acts are framed with short intermezzos about the other sociological key figures who played an important role in the story of sociography, sociology and Public Administration. In conclusion, the author of this essay discusses the continuing relevance of sociology for modern Public Administration. |