Changes in views on the management of non-profit organizations have implications for the role expected of administrators. This also has an important influence on the requirements placed on these administrators. In the Dutch context, it has not previously been investigated whether and how the requirements for administrators change, and to what extent this occurs in conjunction with changes in the views on the management of non-profit organizations. This is central to this study. By means of a content analysis, in which 363 recruitment texts from the period 1980-2010 were analyzed, the authors show that more and more divergent demands are made on administrators in non-profit organizations. With our study we also show that this accumulation is closely related to views on management. Regulators are advised to focus on optimizing requirements, rather than maximizing them. This allows for more targeted and more adequate recruitment. The study also shows that accountability has not previously been a specific requirement in recruitment texts, whereas this is desirable in the light of previous incidents. Our recommendation to supervisors is to pay more specific attention to this when drawing up job profiles. The relevance for practitioners is (a) that the study provides insight into the relationship between views on the management of non-profit organizations and the demands placed on directors by supervisors; (b) this also clarifies that there are or may be blind spots, as becomes clear with regard to accountability requirements; and finally (c) our study provides food for thought about the role of recruitment texts in the selection process, and whether the requirements set are really relevant to the organization. |
Zoekresultaat: 3 artikelen
Artikel |
Kleine teksten, grootse verwachtingenDe toename van eisen aan bestuurders in non-profitorganisaties |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Auteurs | Dr. Morris Oosterling en Prof. dr. Theo Camps |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Dossier |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Women’s suffrage, Colonial history, The Netherlands, Political equality, Voting rights |
Auteurs | Devika Partiman |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In 2019, throughout The Netherlands, 100 years of women’s suffrage was celebrated. This celebration is historically incorrect: the voting law from 1919, broadly seen as the law that gave all Dutch women the right to vote, was a discriminatory law. It excluded many women – mostly those living in the former colonized parts of the Kingdom of The Netherlands – for decades after the laws implementation. This article shares a more complete history of women’s suffrage in The Netherlands, through the history of the voting law in the entire Kingdom of The Netherlands. The article gives insight into how this historical political exclusion still contributes to a lack of representation of many women in The Netherlands. |
Praktijk |
IKPOB is dood, leve de erfenis: een evaluatie |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 4 2017 |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Roel in ’t Veld |
Auteursinformatie |