The refugee crisis of 2015-2016 prompted European governments to quickly institute new asylum seeker centres. Often however, plans for opening new reception centres are met with protest in surrounding localities. Gaining public support for new ASCs has become a pressing governance issue facing local governments. This research looks at whether a policy strategy of ‘giving back’ to the neighbourhood rather than ‘giving in’ to the demands of protesters can minimise local opposition and alleviate negative attitudes . A door-to-door survey of N = 511 neighbourhood residents is combined with semi-structured interview data of N = 31 neighbourhood residents. We find that attitudes were already neutral to fairly positive shortly after the centre opened and fears of nuisance and crime did not materialise. Those who became involved in the ASCs’ courses and activities are a small and selective group who were already fairly accepting of the centre. Contact between asylum seekers and neighbours developing within and beyond the ASC was valued but did not develop into stronger ties due to frequent moves of asylum seekers and early closure of the ASC. |
Zoekresultaat: 139 artikelen
Thema-artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Auteurs | Dr. Haiko van der Voort en Joanna Strycharz Msc |
Auteursinformatie |
Thema-artikel |
Niet toegeven maar teruggeven bij protestEffecten van beleid bij vestiging van een asielzoekerscentrum in Utrecht |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | asylum seeker centres, local opposition, policy effects, inter-group contact, Utrecht |
Auteurs | Dr. Rianne Dekker, Dr. Karin Geuijen en Dr. Caroline Oliver |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Thema-artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | decentralization, migrant integration, social contact, mainstreaming, living labs |
Auteurs | Dr. Rianne Dekker en Dr. Meike Bokhorst |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
After the European refugee crisis of 2015-2016, many Dutch municipalities took initiative in (re)shaping policies of asylum seeker reception and refugee integration in their own ways. We are witnessing a ‘local turn’ of integration policies with decentralization of responsibilities to the local level of governance. Besides civic integration and socioeconomic integration, social integration of asylum seekers and refugees has been a concern as these groups are often housed in superdiverse and vulnerable neighborhoods. How can municipalities best address the specific problems in their cities? This editorial introduces the four articles that are part of this special issue. We discuss three overarching topics. First, we argue that aside from targeting specific groups and issues, cities should develop mainstreamed policies and provisions to be able to handle future fluctuations and changes in their populations. Second, we observe that in policies aimed at enhancing inter-group contact, earlier immigrant groups are often overlooked. They can play a bridging role in establishing social connections. Third, we highlight the role of urban experiments and living labs in transfer and upscaling of innovative policies. |
Thema-artikel |
Van diversiteitsagenda’s tot participatietrajectenEen vergelijking van lokaal vluchtelingenbeleid in zestien Nederlandse gemeenten |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | local governance, decentralization, refugees, immigrant integration, mainstreaming |
Auteurs | Ilona van Breugel MSc |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article describes the main trends in refugee policies in sixteen Dutch cities, offering an overview of the local approaches to the reception, housing and integration of refugees that the cities rapidly had to develop in response to the increased refugee inflow in 2015. In contrast to other studies that often focus on capital and gateway cities, this article illustrates the variety of local approaches to migration diversity and refugee integration. By illustrating the different positions municipalities take, the article shows the local power to innovate. In this article clusters of cities with comparable approaches to refugee policies are identified to aid cooperation and knowledge exchange between cities, in which the big cities are not necessarily always the relevant partners. |
Boekbespreking |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleidsonderzoek Online, augustus 2020 |
Auteurs | Joost Fledderus |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In maart 2020 verscheen het boek Beleidsevaluatie in theorie en praktijk van Peter van der Knaap, Valérie Pattyn en Dick Hanemaayer. Joost Fledderus bespreekt de inhoud van het boek en geeft aan welke meerwaarde het biedt voor (aankomende) beleidsonderzoekers. |
Artikel |
Het spel en de knikkers: ervaren rechtvaardigheid in vier lokale participatieprocessen |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Auteurs | Drs. Christine Bleijenberg, Dr. Reint Jan Renes, Prof. dr. Noëlle Aarts e.a. |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Designing and implementing participation processes that are perceived as meaningful by both municipalities and citizens requires insight into the assessment by participants. In this study the theory of experienced procedural justice is applied in the context of citizen participation. To gain insight into the importance of the outcome and the course of the process in the assessment by participants, the authors have used survey research to collect data from four different participation processes in a Dutch municipality (Delft). The results of this explorative study show that the respondents rate the participation processes in which they have participated as reasonably fair. There is a fair process effect when respondents experienced the process as fair and their confidence in the municipality increases, even if the outcome is unfavourable for them. For practitioners, this study shows that the dimensions of procedural justice, namely respect, having a voice and explanation, are guiding principles for the design and implementation of participation processes. There is still much to be achieved, especially when it comes to being given an explanation, so information about the decision-making process and accountability for the substantive choices that have been made. Finally, regular evaluation research is needed to set up participation processes that tie in with what participants think is important. |
Artikel |
Naoorlogs universalisme in het huidige socialezekerheidsdebat |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Social security system, welfare state, Universalism, public advisory agencies, working poor |
Auteurs | Dr. Barbara Brink en Prof. dr. Gijsbert Vonk |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Western European social security systems are founded on the need to offer universal social protection, as was for example advocated in the Beveridge report of 1942. The universalistic endeavour has led to the development of the all-embracing welfare states of today, but already for many decades dissatisfaction with the direction of the welfare state has led to a diversion of the universalistic pretention. In the current debate, universalism seems to be on the rise again. The Dutch think tanks CPB, WRR and SCP increasingly pay attention to the divide that is becoming manifest between those with better chances in the society and who are left behind. The think tanks have all formulated policy options in order to address this divide by offering better social security protection for excluded groups. In this article we discuss whether the options presented fall back upon the post-war notion of universality. |
Dossier |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Auteurs | Fabian Dekker |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors discuss recent research findings that are of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Dossier |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Labour market, Dividing lines, Policy feasibility, Participation Act, Sustainable employability |
Auteurs | Dr. ir. Maroesjka Versantvoort en Prof. dr. Kim Putters |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Recent developments on the Dutch labour market raise questions about the emergence of new social dividing lines. In this paper we discuss two cases. Both address labour market disadvantages which can easily deepen and sharpen with unchanged policies. The first case shows that there are groups that are less able to respond to the defined trends in the labour market due to a lack of education or disabilities. In the second case we focus on the question of sustainable employability as such that creates dividing lines. A first conclusion from our contribution is that a thorough analysis of existing dividing lines in the labour market is crucial for effective policy, but that knowledge about deepening old and creating new dividing lines is at least as relevant. A second conclusion is that the outlined assumptions in policies around self-reliance of, for example, people with a disability or the possibilities of employers to realize sheltered work and to focus on retraining, for example outside working hours, are not always realistic. Much more will have to be done to match the real possibilities of people and organizations to achieve this. Financial, but also organizational and personal. The motivations and behaviors of employees, employers and educational authorities appear to be very relevant explanatory factors in practice, which are often not sufficiently taken into account. Recent experiences with the Participation Act and lifelong learning show us that. More interaction is needed in the coming years between research, policy and the practice of the labour market. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleidsonderzoek Online, april 2020 |
Auteurs | Hans Boutellier |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Naar aanleiding van 25 jaar Vereniging voor Beleidsonderzoek staat dit artikel stil bij de rol van beleidsonderzoek. Het belang daarvan wordt nogal eens onderschat – zowel door beleidsmakers als onderzoekers zelf. Vanuit een wat breder perspectief bezien blijkt het voor de huidige samenleving – getypeerd als ‘een pragmacratie’ – echter een onmisbare functie te vervullen. Beleid en praktijk zijn vaak indirect gebaseerd op wetenschappelijke concepten, onderzoeksresultaten en toekomstverkenningen. Vooral de sociale wetenschappen maken zichtbaar wat mogelijk is, en beleidsonderzoek doet dat dan ook nog eens op een tijdige, oplossingsgerichte manier. Daarbij zijn er verschillende manieren om impact te hebben, waarbij de beleidsonderzoeker moet vasthouden aan zijn onafhankelijkheid en controleerbaarheid. |
Reflectie & debat |
Overheid en individu in een lege polder |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Auteurs | Albert Jan Kruiter |
Reflectie & debat |
De proteststem van Pim Fortuyn is nog springlevend |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Auteurs | Dr. Fabian Dekker |
Auteursinformatie |
Reflectie & debat |
Voorbij het stigma van de populistische demonstrant: protest heeft een centrale functie in onze democratie! |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Auteurs | Dr. Nanke Verloo |
Auteursinformatie |
Reflectie & debat |
Protesten in Nederland: pijnlijk polderen zonder elite |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Auteurs | Dr. Tamara Metze |
Auteursinformatie |
Essay |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleidsonderzoek Online, maart 2020 |
Auteurs | Peter van Hoesel |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Beleidsonderzoek is een vak dat in de afgelopen vijftig jaar geleidelijk is ontwikkeld tot een echte professie. In dit essay wordt de eerste helft van deze periode beschreven en op diverse punten vergeleken met de huidige situatie. De terugblik bestaat uit drie onderdelen: professionalisering; relatie met opdrachtgevers; ambachtelijke aspecten. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleidsonderzoek Online, januari 2020 |
Auteurs | Ellen Minkman en Astrid Molenveld |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Q-methodologie is een nog relatief onbekende onderzoeksmethode, met veel potentieel voor beleidsonderzoek en -analyse. De benaderingen, doelen en onderzoeksvragen in verschillende toepassingen lopen uiteen, maar vertonen ook duidelijke overeenkomsten. In dit artikel beschrijven we de belangrijkste theoretische en analytische bouwstenen van de methode, en een praktijkgericht 10-stappenplan waarmee men snel zelf aan de slag kan met Q-methodologie. Op basis van een aantal toepassingen van Q-methodologie in Nederland en Vlaanderen laat dit artikel op inzichtelijke wijze zien wat Q-methodologie toevoegt aan de toolbox van beleidsonderzoekers. Naast de theoretische achtergrond van de methode biedt deze bijdrage een praktisch stappenplan voor het gebruik van de methode in de praktijk. |
Thema-artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 3 2019 |
Trefwoorden | Positive Public Administration, successful public governance, research agenda, societal relevance |
Auteurs | Scott Douglas DPhil, Prof. dr. Trui Steen en Prof. dr. Zeger van der Wal |
Samenvatting |
Citizens and scholars excel in identifying and analysing government failure. It is important indeed to understand public sector, but while governments in the Low Countries are doing well on average and very well from an internationally perspective, most attention is focused on the errors and mishaps. This article argues for a robust positive perspective on the public sector as a complement to existing research. From a scientific perspective, public administration must set itself the ambition to connect and aggregate existing positive insights even better. From a social perspective, the discipline must prevent the gap from being filled by a wholesale rejection of democratic government or the use of unproven miracle cures. This article elaborates the starting points for Positive Public Administration, arguing that this perspective should be comprehensive, context related, inter-subjective, learning-oriented, and robustly scientific in nature. The article also introduces the other contributions in this special issue, which together give an initial interpretation of positive public administration. |
Thema-artikel |
Positieve beleidsevaluatie: hoe evaluatieonderzoek kan bijdragen aan beter beleid |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 3 2019 |
Trefwoorden | positive public administration, positive evaluation, positive psychology, success, policy oriented learning |
Auteurs | Dr. Peter van der Knaap en Dr. Rudi Turksema |
Samenvatting |
New insights from the field of positive psychology led to the insight that people learn more effectively from positive feedback. Policy evaluation aims to improve public policy programmes through contributing to both accountability and learning. This ambiguous ambition has contributed to a considerable body of research into the impact of policy evaluation. Too often the conclusion is that the outcomes of policy evaluations – which are often negative by nature – are sparsely used by policy makers. This has led to series of improvements in the way we carry out evaluations. First through technical improvements and then by more responsive approaches. Both have not led to the desired breakthrough. Building on a number of positive evaluation studies, we advance a more positive approach in policy evaluation. Focussing on the successes in policy programmes rather than on its failures may contribute to evaluation impact. Consequently, we think a more positive, appreciative approach and using data to find success in policy making is necessary for policy evaluators to be more effective. This article presents practical examples of positive policy evaluations and successful use of data in the domain of policy evaluation. |
Essay |
|
Tijdschrift | Beleidsonderzoek Online, juni 2019 |
Auteurs | Lennart de Ruig |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Maar liefst drie onderzoekscommissies brachten een rapport uit over de vermeende politieke beïnvloeding en sturing van onderzoek op het WODC van het ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid. Maar uit het rapport van de commissie-Hertogh, die de kwestie in een breder perspectief moest plaatsen, komt geen eenduidig beeld naar voren van de ernst, omvang en oorzaken van de problematiek. Deze commissie verzuimt om een grondige analyse te maken van de achtergronden van de kwestie. Ook de methodologie van het onderzoek van de commissie-Hertogh rammelt, op zijn zachtst gezegd. En de aanbevelingen van deze commissie gaan voorbij aan het belang van interactie tussen beleidsmakers en onderzoekers. Het rapport voldoet niet aan de kwaliteitseisen die je aan beleidsonderzoek kunt stellen. Dat is spijtig: de WODC-affaire had beter onderzoek verdiend. |
Serie |
Ambitieuze en ambivalente vernieuwing van de lokale democratie in Nederland |
Tijdschrift | Bestuurs­wetenschappen, Aflevering 2 2019 |
Auteurs | Dr. Linze Schaap, Prof. dr. Frank Hendriks, Dr. Niels Karsten MA e.a. |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this article in the series on the local democratic audit, the authors argue that municipal democracy in the Netherlands has become a multiple democracy. Within the formal framework of representative democracy, numerous democratic arrangements have emerged that may be referred to as participatory, direct and also what the authors call ‘do-democracy’. Additions to representative democracy did not come without reason: representative democracy is not a perfect system, either in theory or in practice. Efforts have been made to improve the functioning of representative democracy in a number of ways. Three of these are discussed in this article. The authors note that these three reforms do not solve the problems in representative democracy. So the Dutch municipalities have started looking for additions to representative democracy. In this article various forms of participatory, do-it-yourself and direct democracy are discussed. Many effects of these reforms are still unknown and knowledge about them has crumbled, but one conclusion can be drawn: people with a low education are not inclined to take part, even with arrangements that are easily accessible. Striving for a more vital local democracy seems meaningful; the authors formulate a number of ways of thinking about this. |