In this feature authors review recently published books on subjects of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Zoekresultaat: 8 artikelen
Boekbespreking |
Iedere burger een lobbyist? Over politieke participatie voorbij de representatieve democratie. |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2017 |
Auteurs | Dr. Caelesta Braun |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Discussie |
De zin en onzin van een transparante lobby |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2017 |
Auteurs | Dr. Caelesta Braun |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Reflection and debate initiates academically inspired discussions on issues that are on the current policy agenda. |
Discussie |
Een Europees referendum: quantum leap of realistische democratische hervorming? |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 1 2016 |
Auteurs | Dr. Caelesta Braun |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
|
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Bestuurskunde, Aflevering 4 2015 |
Trefwoorden | Public administration |
Auteurs | Dr. Caelesta Braun, Dr. Menno Fenger, Prof. dr. Paul ’t Hart e.a. |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Forty years ago, Dutch Public Administration started as an independent academic discipline. The founding fathers considered empirical application and multidisciplinarity the most important characteristics of public administration. This article assesses the current state of the discipline in the Netherlands. The assessment is the result of a series of five debates throughout the country, focussing on different elements of the Public Administration discipline: education, academic research, consultancy and policy advice. In brief, the article argues that the discipline has reached maturity in these forty years. It has become an accepted academic discipline, on the verge of a mono-discipline. The Netherlands is considered as one of the leading countries in public administration research. However, these successes also create a gap between public administration as a successful academic discipline and its roots as a multi-disciplinary, applied science. Renewing the balance between these two will be the main challenge for the decades to come. |
Discussie |
Van ‘vermogen wint’ naar ‘werkend vermogen’? |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2015 |
Auteurs | Caelesta Braun en Albert Jan Kruiter |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Reflection and Debate initiates academically inspired discussions on issues that are on the current policy agenda. |
Column |
Interview met Kim Putters door Caelesta Braun |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2013 |
Auteurs | Caelesta Braun |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In a column a journal editor or an author expresses his or her opinion on a particular subject. |
Boekbespreking |
1000 jaar Hollandse overlegdemocratie, yet another millennium to go? |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 3 2013 |
Auteurs | Caelesta Braun |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors review recently published books on subjects of interest to readers of Beleid en Maatschappij. |
Artikel |
Laveren tussen belanghebbendenReële autonomie en financieel toezicht |
Tijdschrift | Beleid en Maatschappij, Aflevering 4 2012 |
Trefwoorden | regulatory governance, de facto autonomy, financial supervision, bureaucracy, institutional reform |
Auteurs | Dr. Caelesta Braun |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
De facto autonomy, the actual potential of regulatory agencies to go about their daily work, is often conceived to be more important to explain regulatory capacity than its formal autonomy and responsibilities. In this article we investigate whether external context factors, such as the financial and economic crisis have an impact on de facto autonomy. More specifically, we investigate whether the de facto autonomy varies after the crisis and distinctively so for specific subsets of employees within regulatory agencies. According to literature, mid-level managers of agencies are key to de facto autonomy and building a secure reputation for the agency in question. We test these external and internal effects on de facto autonomy with a survey among employees of the Dutch Financial Market Authority (N = 248). The findings show that the perceived influence of stakeholders is relatively constant, but that it is more dynamic for European stakeholders. Both middle managers and employees working at strategic and policy departments of the agency conceive the impact of European stakeholders as increasing in nature. The findings have important implications for our studies of de facto autonomy of regulatory agencies as well as reform potential after major institutional crises. |