Citizens and scholars excel in identifying and analysing government failure. It is important indeed to understand public sector, but while governments in the Low Countries are doing well on average and very well from an internationally perspective, most attention is focused on the errors and mishaps. This article argues for a robust positive perspective on the public sector as a complement to existing research. From a scientific perspective, public administration must set itself the ambition to connect and aggregate existing positive insights even better. From a social perspective, the discipline must prevent the gap from being filled by a wholesale rejection of democratic government or the use of unproven miracle cures. This article elaborates the starting points for Positive Public Administration, arguing that this perspective should be comprehensive, context related, inter-subjective, learning-oriented, and robustly scientific in nature. The article also introduces the other contributions in this special issue, which together give an initial interpretation of positive public administration. |
Bestuurskunde
Over dit tijdschriftMeld u zich hier aan voor de attendering op dit tijdschrift zodat u direct een mail ontvangt als er een nieuw digitaal nummer is verschenen en u de artikelen online kunt lezen.
Thema-artikel |
Positieve bestuurskundeNaar een robuust positief perspectief op de overheid |
Trefwoorden | Positive Public Administration, successful public governance, research agenda, societal relevance |
Auteurs | Scott Douglas DPhil, Prof. dr. Trui Steen en Prof. dr. Zeger van der Wal |
Samenvatting |
Thema-artikel |
‘Meedoen is belangrijker dan winnen’Prijzen als exponent van de positieve bestuurskunde? |
Trefwoorden | Positive Public Administration, prizes, successes |
Auteurs | Dr. Tom Overmans, Prof. dr. Mirko Noordegraaf en Prof. dr. Filip De Rynck |
Samenvatting |
Positive Public Administration (PPA) encourages scholars to examine governance success. The appreciation of successes, however, is not new. During previous decades, awards were bestowed for exceptional performance. We analyse whether two important awards in the Netherlands and Flanders are an expression of PPA. Firstly, we find that successes are interpreted differently: in the Netherlands, one-off, trendy performances are rewarded, while in Flanders the focus is on consolidated results of long-term change processes. Secondly, we see that ‘clean’ success criteria promote a suggestion of ‘control’, whilst public settings are ambiguous and unpredictable. Finally, we conclude that prizes are primarily celebrations; little evidence is found of systematic knowledge exchange, learning and professionalisation. |
Thema-artikel |
Wanneer worden gemeenten gezien als waardevol?Lokale publieke waardecreatie door de ogen van lokale actoren |
Trefwoorden | public value management, Positive Public Administration, local government, performance assessment |
Auteurs | Scott Douglas DPhil en Prof. dr. Paul ’t Hart |
Samenvatting |
This article explores how we can gain insight into the quality of local government with the help of the public value perspective. The public value perspective does not evaluate government through generalised standards or benchmarks, but through the judgments of the actors involved in the policy. This approach could do better justice to the unique context of different governments, such as different local governments. The public value perspective, however, is hampered by the competing expectations that actors have of public policy and their generally negative bias towards the government. Based on 71 interviews with local actors in six municipalities, we show how the public value approach does indeed yields many different and critical perspectives, even within municipalities that are considered successful by national experts. However, we also show which connections exist between these seemingly competing perspectives and how sombre judgments about past governance are actually influenced by optimistic ambitions for the future. |
Thema-artikel |
Catharsis: een vergeten functie van financiële verantwoording |
Trefwoorden | Catharsis, Accountability, Emotions, Debates, Positive Public Administration |
Auteurs | Dr. Sjoerd Keulen en Dr. Ronald Kroeze |
Samenvatting |
Performance Budgeting has been introduced to gain greater managerial control over the outcomes and efficiency of policies and their budgets. Strikingly, a growing body of literature has explained that politicians hardly use performance information or only to emotionally judge government performance. We, however, propose understanding the emotional use of performance information as catharsis. Catharsis is the ritual of emotional and moral judging to understand and initiate improvement. Catharsis has been named as an important function of accountability, but has not been researched in the field of Public Administration. We discuss the concept of catharsis in relation to accountability and show that, by using evidence from its role in Dutch parliament, the use of ‘cathartic emotions’ are omnipresent in financial debates, especially when parliamentary enquiries and annual budgets are debated. Based on these findings catharsis should be understood as a much more serious function of accountability by both academics and public officials. |
Thema-artikel |
Positieve beleidsevaluatie: hoe evaluatieonderzoek kan bijdragen aan beter beleid |
Trefwoorden | positive public administration, positive evaluation, positive psychology, success, policy oriented learning |
Auteurs | Dr. Peter van der Knaap en Dr. Rudi Turksema |
Samenvatting |
New insights from the field of positive psychology led to the insight that people learn more effectively from positive feedback. Policy evaluation aims to improve public policy programmes through contributing to both accountability and learning. This ambiguous ambition has contributed to a considerable body of research into the impact of policy evaluation. Too often the conclusion is that the outcomes of policy evaluations – which are often negative by nature – are sparsely used by policy makers. This has led to series of improvements in the way we carry out evaluations. First through technical improvements and then by more responsive approaches. Both have not led to the desired breakthrough. Building on a number of positive evaluation studies, we advance a more positive approach in policy evaluation. Focussing on the successes in policy programmes rather than on its failures may contribute to evaluation impact. Consequently, we think a more positive, appreciative approach and using data to find success in policy making is necessary for policy evaluators to be more effective. This article presents practical examples of positive policy evaluations and successful use of data in the domain of policy evaluation. |
Thema-artikel |
Niet meer dan een speldenprik |
Trefwoorden | Positive Public Administration, positivism, research agenda, societal impact |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Willem Trommel |
Samenvatting |
Willem Trommel reflects on the ambitions of Positive Public Administration. He observes that Positive Public Administration is at heart the product of a longing for positivist science and ‘real facts’ in public debate, arguing instead that a more radical overhaul of the discipline is required towards Provocative Public Administration. |
Thema-artikel |
Positieve bestuurskunde: een Europese Minnowbrook (EPPA I) |
Trefwoorden | Positive Public Administration, European research, research agenda, societal impact |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Geert Bouckaert |
Samenvatting |
Geert Bouckaert reflects on the ambitions of Positive Public Administration within the larger European research agenda for public administration. |
Vrij artikel |
Burgerparticipatie: ontwikkelingstypen van bewonersverbandenInteractie tussen participatieprofessionals en bewonersverbanden in beeld |
Trefwoorden | citizen participation, self-organisation, public participation professionals, community enterprises, Amsterdam |
Auteurs | Dr. ir. Anna de Zeeuw, Eelco van Wijk MSc en Dr. Alex Straathof |
Samenvatting |
Local authorities expect citizens to fulfil an increasing number of public services. In that context, citizen-based networks are emerging as means to fulfil a variety of public tasks, varying from supporting young entrepreneurs and strengthening social cohesion, to providing local care. In this article, we address the following questions: Which phases do community enterprises pass through in their efforts towards realising a sustainable contribution and how do participation professionals support these phases? To respond to this question, researchers followed seven community enterprises based in Amsterdam over a two-year period. We identified a typology of four development phases, with particular attention to the interaction between external participation professionals and the key persons of community enterprises. The study has practical relevance for governance of citizen participation and also raises important follow-up questions about the role of the local government. |
Vrij artikel |
Paradox van het Pact van de WaardDynamische regionale samenwerking in een krimpende Hoeksche Waard |
Trefwoorden | shrinking regions, regime theory, population decline, regional collaboration, regional strategies |
Auteurs | Janneke Rutgers-Zoet Msc en Dr. Tamara Metze |
Samenvatting |
In several regions in the Netherlands there are declining population numbers. In those regions, administrators, companies and societal organisations often start regional collaborations in order to anticipate population decline and maintain a good quality of life. This is a logical step, but in practice the collaborating partners face challenges. For this article we analysed over a period of eight years the dynamics of cooperation in the Hoeksche Waard, a region in the province of South Holland that is dealing with a decrease in the number of inhabitants. On the basis of the regime model (Stone 1989), and by conducting qualitative research, in this exploratory study we discerned a paradox of regional cooperation in this ‘shrinking’ region: a decline of population numbers is the reason to initiate informal cooperation in networks, but the complexity of the regional agenda leads to the desire for formalisation of the collaborations in formal decision making structures. This formalisation, in its turn, leads to less commitment from the parties and makes cooperation and achieving results difficult, which increases the need for informalisation. |
Kroniek |
Makkelijker kunnen we het wel maken, beter voorlopig nietWat de Belastingdienst kan leren van institutionele crisistheorie |
Auteurs | Prof. mr. dr. Stavros Zouridis en Vera Leijtens LLB MSc |
Dissertatie |
What makes innovations survive?An investigation into public sector innovations in six European countries |
Auteurs | Wouter van Acker |